Dian Nahdawati
Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

The Effectiveness Ihsan Culture Focus-Care through Intentional Rounds on Patient Satisfaction Dian Nahdawati; Eni Widiastuti; Harif Fadhillah; Muhammad Hadi
Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research Vol. 8 No. 4 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research
Publisher : GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCE GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37287/ijghr.v8i4.1930

Abstract

One indicator of service quality at hospitals is patient satisfaction. Organizational culture and caring practices play a role in increasing patient satisfaction. At Permata Jonggol Hospital,. the results of patient complaints convey a lack of nurses visiting patients, interactions occur for routine activities. Permata Jonggol has an IHSAN (Integrity, Harmony, Solutif, Entushiasim, Value) organizational culture but its implementation is not yet visible. There needs to be an intervention through periodic visits and structured communication called Intentional rounds by integrating the organizational culture. The study purpose was to identify differences in patient satisfaction and to determine the effectiveness of implementing IHSAN culture-focused care through intentional rounds. The research design used a quasi-experimental design with a pre-post test design. The population was nurses and patients in the inpatient ward using total sampling. A total of 60 respondents were included in this study, consisting of 30 respondents in the intervention group and 30 respondents in the control group. The results showed no difference in patient satisfaction before implementation between the intervention and the control group (0.446 > 0.05) but there was a significant difference in patient satisfaction after implementation between the intervention and the control group (0.001 < 0.05). There was a significant difference before and after the implementation of care in the intervention group (0.011 < 0.05), while in the control group, there was no difference in patient satisfaction (0.855 > 0.05). This care showed positive effects, however, the pattern of improvement from week to week appeared to fluctuate so that the consistency of the effects over time could not be ascertained.