Ido Gustiawan Putra
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Kebijakan Formulasi Jual Beli Aset Kripto yang Melibatkan Notaris dalam Mencegah Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Ido Gustiawan Putra; M. Arief Amrullah; Firman Floranta Adonara
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i2.11426

Abstract

The rapid development of crypto assets characterized by decentralization, anonymity, and high transaction speed has increased the risk of money laundering, which is not yet fully addressed by Indonesia’s current legal framework. This study aims to analyze the ratio legis of the existing regulatory formulation concerning crypto asset transactions involving Notaries in preventing money laundering and to propose an ius constituendum to strengthen future legal protection. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s regulations cover economic aspects and AML measures, however the preventive framework remains sectoral because AML obligations are imposed only on crypto asset traders, resulting in an incomplete preventive protection mechanism. The discussion highlights that involving Notaries as authentic deed officials has the potential to reinforce due diligence, enhance legal certainty, and prevent the misuse of crypto assets for money laundering in accordance with FATF standards. The study concludes that revisions to the Financial Sector Development and Strengthening Law, the Anti-Money Laundering Law, and related regulations are necessary to mandate Notary involvement in every crypto asset transaction as part of a national AML strategy.
MEDIATION AS AN EFFORT TO SETTLE INHERITANCE DISPUTES FROM THE LEGAL OBJECTIVE THEORY PERSPECTIVE (Study of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016) Ido Gustiawan Putra; Dominikus Rato; Dyah Ochtorina Susanti
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 12, No 3 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v12i3.5608

Abstract

This article analyzes Mediation in Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 1of 2016 as an effort by the Religious Court to resolve inheritance disputes from the perspective of legal purpose theory. The theory of legal purpose is used to see the content of legal certainty, justice, and benefit in PERMA Number 1 of 2016 which is the legal basis for Mediation of inheritance disputes. This research is a yuridical normative research of the library research type. The results of this study indicate that Mediation regulated by PERMA Number 1 of 2016 contains legal objectives in the form of certainty, justice, and legal benefits, so that Mediation must be implemented by the court as the first way to resolve inheritance disputes. Keywords: Mediation; PERMA Number 1 of 2016, Inheritance Dispute, Legal Objective Theory