Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

THE POLITICS OF PUBLIC HEALTH DATA: A STUDY ON DATA GOVERNANCE, PRIVACY, AND SECURITY DURING HEALTH CRISES Sarah Zielda Najib; Nurul Hidayati; Teguh Setiawan Wibowo; Rania Khatib
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v3i3.3151

Abstract

Public health crises such as pandemics intensify the political significance of health data, exposing tensions between the need for rapid data sharing, the protection of individual privacy, and the assurance of data security. Governments increasingly rely on large-scale data collection and digital surveillance to inform policy responses, yet these practices often raise ethical, legal, and political concerns. This study aims to analyze how data governance frameworks shape the management of public health data during health crises, with particular attention to the balance between public interest, privacy rights, and data security. The research employs a qualitative research design based on document analysis and comparative policy review, examining national regulations, emergency health policies, and international guidelines related to health data governance. The findings indicate that data governance during health crises is strongly influenced by political priorities, institutional capacity, and levels of public trust. Weak regulatory clarity and limited oversight mechanisms tend to exacerbate privacy risks and public resistance, while transparent governance models and robust security protocols enhance data legitimacy and compliance. The study concludes that effective public health data governance requires an integrated approach that aligns legal safeguards, ethical principles, and technological security with crisis-driven decision-making. Strengthening accountability and transparency is essential to ensuring that public health objectives do not undermine fundamental rights during emergencies.
Comparative Evaluation of Gig Worker and Conventional Worker Welfare to Improve Quality Employment and Encourage Entrepreneurship Using the Propensity Score Matching Approach Shobikin Shobikin; Damarsari Ratnasahara Elisabeth; Teguh Setiawan Wibowo; Mochamad Fatchurrohman
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 11 (2025): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, November 2025
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v4i11.4657

Abstract

The development of the digital economy has driven the emergence of gig workers, who are increasingly dominating the labor market. Despite offering flexibility, gig workers continue to face uncertainty regarding welfare conditions, which differ from those of conventional workers. Comparing the welfare of these two groups is essential to provide insights into job quality and its implications for entrepreneurship and inclusive economic development. This study aims to conduct a comparative evaluation of the welfare of gig and conventional workers. Specifically, it seeks to identify the key welfare dimensions that distinguish the two groups and to provide an empirical basis for formulating policies aimed at improving job quality. The research was conducted in the regions of Surabaya, Sidoarjo, Gresik, and Mojokerto, involving 400 respondents, consisting of 200 gig workers and 200 conventional workers. The Propensity Score Matching (PSM) method was employed to ensure comparability of respondents’ characteristics based on age, gender, education level, geographic location, and employment sector, thereby enabling a more valid and reliable comparison of welfare outcomes. The findings reveal that conventional workers enjoy more stable welfare, particularly in terms of income, access to social security, and job security. In contrast, gig workers demonstrate advantages in time flexibility and opportunities to generate additional income. Thus, a trade off emerges between stability and flexibility that differentiates the two types of workers. These results highlight the need for more adaptive labor policies, such as the expansion of social security coverage for gig workers, stronger legal protection, and tailored entrepreneurship development programs. Such measures are expected to enhance multidimensional welfare while fostering the creation of quality jobs in the digital economy era.