Rania Khatib
Jordan University of Science and Technology

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

LEADERSHIP STYLES AND THEIR EFFECTIVENESS IN MANAGING REMOTE TEAMS: A PSYCHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS Rania Khatib; Salma Hamdan; Rami Hariri
Research Psychologie, Orientation et Conseil Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rpoc.v3i3.3940

Abstract

The rise of remote work has introduced new challenges in leadership, requiring managers to adapt their styles to effectively manage geographically dispersed teams. Leadership styles play a crucial role in influencing team dynamics, motivation, and performance. As organizations continue to embrace remote work, understanding how different leadership styles affect the management of remote teams is essential for enhancing team effectiveness and productivity. This study aims to analyze the impact of different leadership styles transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire on the effectiveness of managing remote teams. The research seeks to identify which leadership styles are most effective in promoting employee engagement, motivation, and job satisfaction in a remote work environment. A mixed-methods approach was employed, utilizing both quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews. Data were collected from 250 employees working in remote teams across various industries. The surveys assessed leadership style preferences and the perceived effectiveness of leadership in managing remote teams, while the interviews provided deeper insights into the psychological impact of these leadership styles on team members. The findings revealed that transformational leadership had the most positive effect on team motivation, satisfaction, and performance, while laissez-faire leadership was associated with lower levels of engagement and job satisfaction. Transactional leadership had a moderate impact on team effectiveness.  
Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime Loso Judijanto; Bassam Al-Khouri; Rania Khatib
Journal of Tecnologia Quantica Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/quantica.v2i2.1964

Abstract

Quantum field theory and general relativity are the two main pillars of modern physics. However, the two still cannot be combined consistently to explain cosmic phenomena at the microscopic level, especially in the context of curved spacetime. This research aims to explore the interaction between quantum fields and the curvature of spacetime, with a focus on the implications of quantum gravity. This research aims to understand how quantum fields interact with curved spacetime, as well as to develop a more comprehensive model of physics that combines these two concepts. The methods used include the development of mathematical models and numerical simulations to integrate quantum field theory with general relativity. The analysis was carried out by examining the impact of space-time curvature on quantum field fluctuations around massive objects such as black holes. The findings show that the curvature of spacetime has a major influence on the behavior of the quantum field, leading to modifications in energy distribution and field fluctuations. This discovery opens up new possibilities in the development of a more complete theory of quantum gravity. This study provides new insights into understanding the relationship between quantum fields and curved spacetime, as well as opening the way for further research in the field of quantum gravity and extreme cosmic phenomena.  
THE POLITICS OF PUBLIC HEALTH DATA: A STUDY ON DATA GOVERNANCE, PRIVACY, AND SECURITY DURING HEALTH CRISES Sarah Zielda Najib; Nurul Hidayati; Teguh Setiawan Wibowo; Rania Khatib
Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/politicae.v3i3.3151

Abstract

Public health crises such as pandemics intensify the political significance of health data, exposing tensions between the need for rapid data sharing, the protection of individual privacy, and the assurance of data security. Governments increasingly rely on large-scale data collection and digital surveillance to inform policy responses, yet these practices often raise ethical, legal, and political concerns. This study aims to analyze how data governance frameworks shape the management of public health data during health crises, with particular attention to the balance between public interest, privacy rights, and data security. The research employs a qualitative research design based on document analysis and comparative policy review, examining national regulations, emergency health policies, and international guidelines related to health data governance. The findings indicate that data governance during health crises is strongly influenced by political priorities, institutional capacity, and levels of public trust. Weak regulatory clarity and limited oversight mechanisms tend to exacerbate privacy risks and public resistance, while transparent governance models and robust security protocols enhance data legitimacy and compliance. The study concludes that effective public health data governance requires an integrated approach that aligns legal safeguards, ethical principles, and technological security with crisis-driven decision-making. Strengthening accountability and transparency is essential to ensuring that public health objectives do not undermine fundamental rights during emergencies.