Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Manifestasi Nilai-Nilai Islam Madani di Kalangan Generasi Muslim Gen Z melalui Prinsip Moderasi (Wasathiyyah), Filantropi Digital, dan Kepedulian Ekologis Tantri Irawan; Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas; Ramdani Wahyu Sururie; Chaerul Shaleh; Ine Fauziah; Ayi Yunus Rusyana
Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science Vol 5 No 01 (2026): Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/jmws.v5i01.3091

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji manifestasi nilai-nilai Islam Madani di kalangan generasi Muslim Gen Z melalui prinsip moderasi (wasathiyyah), filantropi digital, dan kepedulian ekologis. Dalam era digital yang sarat dengan perubahan nilai sosial, generasi ini menafsirkan kembali etika Islam tidak hanya sebagai spiritualitas pribadi, tetapi juga sebagai tanggung jawab sosial yang diwujudkan melalui gaya hidup berkeadilan, konsumsi moderat, serta keterlibatan aktif dalam kegiatan sosial dan lingkungan seperti charity run, donasi digital, dan eco-sadaqah. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan sosiologis dan etika ekonomi Islam, penelitian ini menelaah bagaimana inovasi teknologi dan media sosial telah mentransformasi bentuk-bentuk sedekah tradisional menjadi praktik filantropi digital yang inklusif, transparan, dan berkelanjutan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa semangat Islam Madani yang menekankan keseimbangan, keadilan, dan kasih saying tetap hidup di kalangan Muslim muda yang kini membentuk pola keberagamaan baru yang moderat, partisipatif, dan berorientasi pada maslahah ‘ammah. Fenomena ini menegaskan bahwa Islam Madani di era Gen Z menjadi model praksis keberislaman modern yang mengintegrasikan iman, teknologi, dan tanggung jawab ekologis dalam mewujudkan masyarakat yang adil, berkeadaban, dan berkelanjutan.
Implementation of the Principle of Transparency in Village Financial Management in Accordance with Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 20 of 2018 A Constitutional Review (Case Study of Jelegong Village, Rancaekek District, Bandung Regency) Noval Nuraditya; Chaerul Shaleh; Aji Saptaji
al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i1.3262

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of transparency principles in the financial management of Jelegong Village, Rancaekek District, Bandung Regency, and review it from the perspective of Siyasah Dusturiyah. Transparency in village financial management is based on the provisions of Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, Law Number 14 of 2008 concerning Public Information Disclosure, and Permendagri Number 20 of 2018 concerning Village Financial Management as a normative basis for realizing accountability and public information disclosure at the village level. This study uses an empirical juridical approach with a descriptive qualitative method. The results show that 1) the Jelegong Village government has implemented the principle of transparency through the dissemination of financial information in village deliberation forums and public information boards, but its implementation has not been fully optimal due to limitations in information updates, minimal use of digital media, and low levels of community participation; 2) the implementation of transparency in village financial management from the perspective of Siyasah Dusturiyah has, in principle, reflected the values of trust and maslahah, but has not fully realized justice and information disclosure equally for the entire village community.
The Determination of National Disaster Status under Law Number 24 of 2007 on Disaster Management: An Analysis from the Perspective of Siyasah Dusturiyah Fidya Rizka Meylanti; Chaerul Shaleh; Taufiq Alamsyah
Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies (April)
Publisher : Postgraduate Program of the State Islamic Institute of Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/jiis.v5i2.11826

Abstract

This study is motivated by the ambiguity of Article 7 paragraph (2) of Law Number 24 of 2007 on Disaster Management, which stipulates five indicators for determining national disaster status namely the number of casualties, property losses, damage to infrastructure, the extent of affected areas, and socio-economic impacts without providing binding quantitative thresholds. This normative ambiguity grants excessively broad executive discretion and has resulted in inconsistent treatment of major disaster events in Indonesia. The study aims to analyze the application of attributed authority in determining national disaster status, examine the procedures for establishing disaster indicators under Law Number 24 of 2007, and assess the issue from the perspective of Siyasah Dusturiyah. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches with a descriptive-analytical design. Data were analyzed using the interactive model developed by Miles, Huberman, and Saldana. The findings reveal that the President's authority to declare a national disaster derives from constitutionally attributed powers inherent to the office; however, such authority is not supported by an adequate disaster risk governance mechanism. Consequently, the risk assessment process becomes disconnected from the risk evaluation stage due to the absence of binding quantitative parameters. From the perspective of Siyasah Dusturiyah, such attributed authority is justifiable as a mandate to safeguard public welfare (maslahah). Nevertheless, without objective standards, it lies on a delicate boundary between legitimate ijtihad and arbitrary executive discretion. This study concludes that the ambiguity of the indicators set forth in Article 7 paragraph (2) constitutes a systemic deficiency in Indonesia's disaster governance framework. It therefore recommends reformulating the provision by establishing clear, measurable, and accountable quantitative thresholds to strengthen legal certainty, transparency, and accountability in determining national disaster status.