Muhammad Fadlli Robbi Rodiyya
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Tafsir Ahkam tentang Ujrah dan Ju‘alah serta Implementasinya dalam Hukum Ekonomi Islam Muhammad Fadlli Robbi Rodiyya; Mohamad Athoillah
Al-Ihsan: Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Al-Ihsan : Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi Syariah (Juni)
Publisher : Yayasan Rahmat Putra Kurnia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65256/jbes.v4i1.63

Abstract

Studi ini meneliti konsep ujrah dan ju'alah melalui perspektif tafsir ahkam dan penerapannya dalam hukum ekonomi Islam. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dasar Al-Qur'an, interpretasi para ulama hukum Islam, dan penerapan kedua kontrak tersebut dalam praktik ekonomi kontemporer. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan riset perpustakaan. Data diperoleh dari sumber primer termasuk Al-Qur'an, tafsir ahkam klasik dan kontemporer, sastra fiqh, serta sumber sekunder dari jurnal ilmiah dan studi ekonomi Islam. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa ujrah adalah kontrak kompensasi berbasis pekerjaan (ijarah 'ala al-a'mal) di mana jenis pekerjaan, periode, dan remunerasi harus ditentukan dengan jelas. Sementara itu, ju'alah adalah kontrak berbasis penghargaan yang berorientasi pada pencapaian hasil tertentu, memungkinkan fleksibilitas karena ketidakpastian dalam prosesnya. Pelaksanaan kedua kontrak mencerminkan prinsip ekonomi Islam yang menekankan keadilan, transparansi, persetujuan bersama, dan penghindaran gharar. Studi ini merekomendasikan penguatan pemahaman tentang tafsir ahkam sebagai dasar untuk mengembangkan kontrak ekonomi Islam kontemporer.   This study examines the concept of ujrah and ju‘alah through the perspective of tafsir ahkam and its implementation in Islamic economic law. The research aims to analyze the Qur'anic basis, interpretation of Islamic legal scholars, and the application of both contracts in contemporary economic practices. This research uses a qualitative method with a library research approach. Data were obtained from primary sources including the Qur'an, classical and contemporary tafsir ahkam, fiqh literature, and secondary sources from scientific journals and Islamic economic studies. The results indicate that ujrah is an employment-based compensation contract (ijarah ‘ala al-a‘mal) where the type of work, period, and remuneration must be clearly determined. Meanwhile, ju‘alah is a reward-based contract oriented toward achieving certain results, allowing flexibility due to uncertainty in the process. The implementation of both contracts reflects Islamic economic principles emphasizing justice, transparency, mutual consent, and avoidance of gharar. This study recommends strengthening the understanding of tafsir ahkam as a foundation for developing contemporary Islamic economic contracts.  
Islamic Political Economy: Bridging the Gap Between Philosophical Ideals and Contemporary Implementation Reality Muhammad Fadlli Robbi Rodiyya; Chaerul Saleh
El-Uqud: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/jnex3g12

Abstract

Islamic political economy promises distributive justice, social security, accountable markets, and finance connected to productive activity. Yet Indonesia already possesses zakat organizations, sharia supervisory bodies, and a large Islamic financial sector without fully converting those normative commitments into coordinated institutional outcomes. This article explains that gap through a structured integrative library study. Literature was identified through Scopus, Google Scholar, Dimensions, and publisher repositories, complemented by official materials from BAZNAS, the Financial Services Authority (OJK), and Indonesian legislation. Sources were included when they directly addressed Islamic political economy, Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr’s theory, or the governance of zakat, hisbah, and Islamic finance in Indonesia; duplicates, unverifiable opinion pieces, and purely descriptive works without institutional relevance were excluded. The selected materials were coded through four propositions derived from al-Sadr: distribution before production, plural ownership, purposive state intervention, and the rejection of scarcity as a value-neutral master premise. The analysis finds that Indonesia’s implementation gap is produced by downstream bias, fragmented authority, weak coordination, and incentive structures that reward formal compliance more readily than distributive outcomes. Zakat largely repairs income shortfalls after production; modern hisbah functions are dispersed across agencies; and Islamic banking regulation validates contracts more effectively than it measures the distribution of risk, productive assets, and social benefit. The article contributes an institutional reading of al-Sadr and proposes a distribution-chain approach linking access to productive resources, market supervision, risk-sharing finance, and accountable redistribution.