Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Positum Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society
Moh Arifin
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Solusi Kompensasi PHK Massal Honorer BLUD Di RSUD Soewondo Pati: Alfi Olivia Wahyu Febrylian; Moh Arifin
Jurnal Hukum Positum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Positum
Publisher : Prodi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35706/positum.v10i2.13278

Abstract

Pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) massal terhadap 216-220 honorer non-medis di RSUD RAA Soewondo Pati pada 1 Juli 2025 tanpa kompensasi meskipun masa kerja rata-rata 15-20 tahun mengungkap ketidakpatuhan total terhadap Pasal 16 PP No. 35/2021 dan pelanggaran Pasal 28D ayat (1) UUD 1945, diperburuk perekrutan 330 karyawan baru via outsourcing tanpa bukti efisiensi APBD serta demo 100 ribu warga pada 13 Agustus 2025 dengan kerugian Rp6,93 miliar. Penelitian normatif doktrinal dengan studi kasus ini bertujuan mengkaji kepatuhan PHK terhadap kewajiban kompensasi PKWT dan hak pekerjaan layak, serta mengidentifikasi celah hukum seperti legal void pada Peraturan Bupati BLUD Pati dan conflict of norm dengan regulasi nasional. Metode mencakup library research bahan primer (laporan Pansus DPRD, media kredibel) dan sekunder (UUD 1945, UU No. 13/2003, jurnal), dianalisis yuridis melalui inventarisasi, interpretasi, dan komparasi norma HAM. Hasil menunjukkan pelanggaran mutlak kompensasi (nol rupiah), dampak ekonomi-sosial-hukum, serta novelty sebagai preseden pertama BLUD non-medis pasca efisiensi 2025. Kesimpulan merekomendasikan revisi Perbup BLUD Jateng wajibkan kompensasi 6 bulan plus pelatihan ulang bagi 1,9 juta honorer nasional, pengawasan DPRD, sanksi administratif, dan class action PHI Semarang untuk pemulihan hak retroaktif.
Distribution of Inheritance of Joint Property in Indonesian Legal Pluralism: Inter-Legal System Dialogue Toward a Fair Regulatory Framework Moh Arifin; Gunarto; Bambang Tri Bawono; Afif Noor; Kiki Nuriska Denhas
Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Interfaith Dialogue and the Rule of Law
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ciils.v5i1.20525

Abstract

The distribution of inheritance of joint property in the context of succession is one of the issues requiring special attention in Indonesia's pluralistic legal system, which recognizes and applies state law, Islamic law, and customary law. This legal pluralism often results in differing interpretations regarding the status of marital joint property, the rights of the surviving spouse, and the rights of heirs, leading to legal uncertainty and social conflict. This study analyses the distribution of joint property from the perspective of Indonesian legal pluralism. It proposes a fairer regulatory framework, based on the analysis of the Kendal Religious Court Decision No. 838/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Kdl. Employing doctrinal (normative juridical) research, this study qualitatively analyzes primary and secondary legal materials grounded in legal pluralism and interlegality theory, Gustav Radbruch’s theory of the purpose of law, John Rawls’s theory of justice, and the principle of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. The findings show that the Kendal Religious Court has applied the Compilation of Islamic Law and the Marriage Law to fulfill legal certainty; however, its legal considerations remain normatively oriented and have not optimally integrated substantive justice and the realities of life in a pluralistic legal context. This study proposes an integrative regulatory framework that harmonizes state law, Islamic law, and customary law, as well as harmonizes Islamic law with other legal systems, not as rivalrous competition but as a dialogue that safeguards the rights of all heirs. Thus, it is expected that court decisions will create legal certainty, justice, and benefits in Indonesia’s multicultural and multireligious society. 
Co-Authors Afif Noor Alfi Olivia Wahyu Febrylian Bambang Tri Bawono Gunarto Kiki Nuriska Denhas