Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis JURNAL YAQZHAN: Analisis Filsafat, Agama dan Kemanusiaan Jurnal Al-Dustur ZAD Al-Mufassirin Journal of Shoutheast Asian Islam and Society (JSEAIS)
Cholidi, Muhammad Fiqih
Institut PTIQ Jakarta Dan Program Kader Ulama Masjid Istiqlal
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : ZAD Al-Mufassirin

 1 
Evaluating Tafsir Maqāṣidī As A Framework For Ecological Crisis Moderation Cholidi, Muhammad Fiqih; Masuwd, Mowafg Abrahem
ZAD Al-Mufassirin Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): ZAD Al-Mufassirin June 2025
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur'an (STIQ) ZAD

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55759/zam.v7i1.261

Abstract

This study aims to re-evaluate the offer of maqāṣidī interpretation in resolving the ecological crisis caused by the anthropocentric paradigm. This study uses a qualitative method to analyze the philosophy and interpretation products of maqāṣidī tafsir through primary sources such as the works of figures who first formulated maqāṣid of the Qur'an as the philosophy of maqāṣidī tafsir and applied it in interpretation products; among them are Rashid Rida and Ṭāhir Ibn 'Āshūr. Based on this evidence, the findings reveal that there is inconsistency in maqāṣidī interpretation in mediating the contestation between theocentric and anthropocentric paradigms, therefore, it can be said that maqāṣidī interpretation is more adapted to the modern context and its needs without a clear frame of reference, rather than referring to God's purpose, although the word maqāṣid is synonymous with God's purpose. As a result, maqāṣidī interpretation does not place meaning in the midst of the contestation of the two paradigms but prefers one of them accordingly fit to the context.
Co-Authors ABDUL MUIS Abdul Muis Atssania Zahroh Fadlulah, Safiya Ikhwan Ansori Masuwd, Mowafg Abrahem Rif'at Husnul Ma'afi Safiya Fadlulah Sholekhawati