Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Realism: Law Review Rainbow : Journal of Literature, Linguistics and Culture Studies
Ruslan Yusoh
Darussalam School
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA: BETWEEN EXPECTATION AND REALITY Agus Salim; Suryati Suryati; Ruslan Yusoh
Realism: Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Realism: Law Review
Publisher : Sabtida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71250/rlr.v3i2.73

Abstract

This study critically examines the effectiveness of law enforcement efforts against corruption in Indonesia, highlighting the persistent gap between legal expectations and practical outcomes. Despite a comprehensive legal framework including Law No. 31/1999, Law No. 20/2001, and the establishment of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Key Alta institutions continue to face political interference, limited resources, legal loopholes, and inconsistent prosecutorial practices. For example, underscore that although asset recovery and conviction rates have risen, sentencing disparities and institutional constraints remain prevalent, impeding deterrence. Complementing this, identifies political coercion and inadequate capacity at enforcement bodies such as the KPK, police, and judiciary as key impediments. This research employs a normative-juridical method, reviewing legislation, judicial rulings, and institutional practices. It also integrates recent Scopus-indexed empirical studies to strengthen its analytical framework. The findings reveal that while recent innovations such as digital oversight in public procurement have improved transparency and stakeholder engagement, they have not yet substantially closed enforcement gaps. The study concludes that sustainable progress requires enhancing institutional independence, ensuring sufficient funding and resources, tightening legal provisions, fostering judicial reform, and embracing innovative approaches such as e‑procurement systems and civil society oversight. These measures are essential to bridging the divide between aspirations and reality in Indonesia's anti‑corruption enforcement mechanisms, thereby meeting both domestic expectations and global standards.
Parental Misconduct in Child Education: A Legal Perspective on Parents’ Reactions to School Discipline in Indonesia Agus Salim; Ruslan Yusoh
Realism: Law Review Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Realism: Law Review
Publisher : Sabtida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71250/rlr.v3i3.96

Abstract

This article examines parental misconduct in the context of child education, specifically focusing on legal perspectives regarding parents’ reactions to school discipline in Indonesia. The study seeks to analyze how parental interventions, whether excessive or lacking, can disrupt the effectiveness of school disciplinary processes, potentially contravening principles enshrined in national child protection laws. By reviewing statutory regulations such as Law No. 35/2014 on Child Protection and corresponding Ministerial Regulations, this research explores the boundaries of parental rights and responsibilities when responding to disciplinary measures imposed by schools. The methods applied center on normative legal analysis and comparative studies of recent case examples in Indonesian schools. The results reveal ongoing tension between parental authority and school autonomy, highlighting frequent legal ambiguities that complicate child-friendly disciplinary enforcement. The article concludes that balanced cooperation between schools and parents, rooted in legal clarity and mutual respect, is essential for effective child discipline and educational safety in Indonesia.
The Limits of ChatGPT’s Pragmatic Interpretation: An Experimental Study of Conversational Implicature in Indonesian Language Conversations Aris Badara; Muhammad Rifa'ie; Ruslan Yusoh; Ibrahim Salama
Rainbow: Journal of Literature, Linguistics and Culture Studies Vol. 15 No. 3 (2026): October 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/rainbow.v15i3.65667

Abstract

This study evaluates ChatGPT’s interpretative accuracy and contextual sensitivity in understanding conversational implicatures in Indonesian. A computational experimental design employed 80 minimal stimulus pairs, yielding 160 responses across five communication themes and four pragmatic phenomena. Each pair contained identical utterances presented in different situational contexts. Data were collected using GPT-6 at a ‘High’ reasoning level via Temporary Chat (unpersonalised). Two pragmatics experts independently assessed the responses using a 0–2 ordinal rubric. The analysis comprised Interpretation Accuracy (IA), Pairwise Joint Accuracy (PJA), descriptive comparisons between conditions, and qualitative examination of pragmatic inferences. IA reached 98.13% for Rater 1 and 91.25% for Rater 2, while PJA reached 96.25% and 82.50%, respectively. Exact agreement was 93.13%, with a weighted Cohen’s kappa of 0.332, indicating limitations in scoring consistency. According to Rater 2, pairwise accuracy was highest for indirect criticism or evaluation (95.00%) and lowest for indirect refusal (65.00%). Accuracy was descriptively higher in Condition A (96.25%) than in Condition B (86.25%). Qualitative analysis identified instances of inferences exceeding contextual support and insufficient use of relevant contextual information. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating both interpretative accuracy and contextual justification, while acknowledging the sensitivity of performance estimates to rater judgments.        
Co-Authors Agus Salim Agus Salim Aris Badara Ibrahim Salama Muhammad Rifa'ie Suryati Suryati