Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pelaksanaan Ganti Rugi Akibat Pemasangan Tiang Listrik di Lahan Masyarakat di Kota Jambi Nayu Triska Wulan Dari; Diana Rani; Retno Kusuma; Setly Selva Yuneida
Wajah Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v9i2.1839

Abstract

The issue of compensation for the installation of electricity poles on community land in Jambi City is a serious concern, because until now there has been no adequate compensation from PT. PLN (Persero) UP3 Jambi. Residents who own land are questioning their rights regarding the use of private assets for public interests and settlement mechanisms in accordance with regulations. This ambiguity has the potential to cause dissatisfaction, so a solution needs to be found immediately to fulfill community rights. This study uses a socio-legal research approach with an activity plan of three months so that the scope or object of the study is the implementation of compensation due to the installation of electricity poles on community land in Jambi City. For this reason, the main materials and tools are direct research in the Jambi City community and secondary data are books and Law Number 30 of 2009 concerning Electricity. The data collection technique is in the form of interviews so that the data analysis uses qualitative analysis methods. The results of this study are that the regulation of compensation due to the installation of electricity poles on community land has been regulated in Article 30 of Law Number 30 of 2009 concerning Electricity and the implementation of compensation due to the installation of electricity poles on community land in Jambi City has not been implemented compensation to the people of Jambi City related to their land used for the installation of electricity poles by PT. PLN (Persero) UP3 Jambi.
Rehabilitation of Perpetrators of Child Sexual Violence Based on Justice and the State’s Constitutional Responsibility Iis Mardeli; Qadriani Arifuddin; Edi Kristianta Tarigan; Diana Rani; Ayu Efritadewi
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 4, No 4 (2026): November 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23435864

Abstract

Child sexual violence demands state responsibility that extends beyond punishing perpetrators to preventing recidivism through rehabilitation. Although offender rehabilitation has been recognized under Indonesian positive law, differences in the scope of existing regulations raise questions regarding the proportionality of rehabilitative measures and the state's constitutional responsibility to ensure child protection. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing the rehabilitation of perpetrators of child sexual violence from the perspectives of justice and the state's constitutional responsibility. Employing normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study qualitatively examines primary and secondary legal materials through grammatical and systematic interpretation. The findings reveal that offender rehabilitation is regulated under the Sexual Violence Crimes Law, child protection legislation, and the correctional system, each with distinct scopes, mechanisms, and implementing authorities. Rehabilitation constitutes a measure that may proportionately accompany criminal punishment based on offenders' individual needs, without eliminating criminal liability or undermining victims' rights. The study concludes that the state's constitutional responsibility extends beyond punishment to ensuring the provision of lawful, proportionate, and appropriately structured rehabilitation aimed at the sustained protection of children. Accordingly, greater harmonization in the application of rehabilitation provisions, stronger interinstitutional coordination and oversight, and individualized assessments of offenders' needs and risks are necessary, while consistently prioritizing the best interests of the child.