Zulkifli Siregar
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENGARUH INDEKS PEMBANGUNAN MANUSIA DAN PENGANGGURAN TERHADAP TINGKAT KEMISKINAN DI INDONESIA Balqis Sri Andini; Zulkifli Siregar; M. Sahnan M. Sahnan
MEDIA MANAJEMEN JASA Vol 13, No 2 (2025): MEDIA MANAJEMEN JASA (MMJ)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS 17 AGUSTUS 1945 jAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52447/mmj.v13i2.9146

Abstract

ABSTRAKStudi ini meneliti bagaimana IPM dan pengangguran mempengaruhi tingkat kemiskinan Indonesia pada tahun 2014–2023. Data sekunder Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) dan analisis regresi linier berganda SPSS digunakan dalam investigasi kuantitatif ini. Data studi menunjukkan bahwa IPM dan pengangguran mempengaruhi kemiskinan. Selama periode studi, rata-rata IPM adalah 68,22, pengangguran 6,79%, dan kemiskinan 14,98%. Normalitas, tidak adanya multikolinearitas, heteroskedastisitas, dan autokorelasi ditemukan dalam data penelitian melalui uji asumsi konvensional. IPM memiliki efek negatif dan signifikan terhadap kemiskinan, tetapi pengangguran memiliki efek positif dan signifikan. Koefisien determinasi (R²) sebesar 0,875 menyiratkan bahwa IPM dan tingkat pengangguran mencakup 87,5% varians dalam tingkat kemiskinan, sedangkan 12,5% sisanya didorong oleh faktor eksternal yang tidak dimodelkan. Uji-t dan uji-F menunjukkan bahwa kedua faktor independen tersebut mempengaruhi kemiskinan secara individual dan kolektif. Model yang digunakan dalam karya ini cocok untuk menjelaskan hubungan HDI-pengangguran-kemiskinan Indonesia. Kata kunci: Indeks Pembangunan Manusia, Pengangguran, Tingkat Kemiskinan ABSTRACT            This study examines how HDI and unemployment affect Indonesia's poverty rate in 2014–2023.  The Central Statistics Agency (BPS) secondary data and SPSS multiple linear regression analysis are used in this quantitative investigation.  Data study shows that HDI and unemployment affect poverty.  Over the study period, the average HDI was 68.22, unemployment was 6.79%, and poverty was 14.98%.  Normality, absence of multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity, and autocorrelation are found in the research data via the conventional assumption test.  The HDI has a negative and significant effect on poverty, but unemployment has a positive and significant effect.  The coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.875 implies that the HDI and unemployment rate account for 87.5% of the variance in poverty rates, while the remaining 12.5% is driven by external factors not modelled.  The t-test and F-test show that both independent factors affect poverty individually and collectively.  The model utilised in this work is suitable for explaining the Indonesian HDI-unemployment-poverty link.Keywords: Human Development Index, Unemployment, Poverty Rate
Pengaruh Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai di Distrik Navigasi Tipe A Kelas I Belawan Muhammad MD; Bakhtiar Bakhtiar; Zulkifli Siregar
Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): September: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jimak.v5i3.7912

Abstract

 Employee performance is one of the key factors determining an organization's success in achieving its objectives. Several factors are assumed to influence employee performance, including human resource quality and work motivation. This study aimed to analyze the effect of human resource quality and work motivation on employee performance at the Class I Type A Navigation District Office of Belawan. This research employed a quantitative approach using an associative research design. The population consisted of 151 employees, while the sample included 60 respondents selected through a stratified random sampling technique. Data were collected using questionnaires and analyzed through descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression with IBM SPSS Statistics version 26. The findings indicate that human resource quality has no significant effect on employee performance. Likewise, work motivation does not significantly affect employee performance. Simultaneously, human resource quality and work motivation also do not have a significant effect on employee performance. The coefficient of determination indicates that both independent variables explain only a small proportion of the variation in employee performance, suggesting that other factors play a more dominant role. Future studies are recommended to include additional variables such as leadership, organizational culture, work discipline, and work environment to develop a more comprehensive research model.