Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERBANDINGAN DATA DUKUNGAN TANAH HASIL ANALISIS SONDIR DENGAN METODE EMPIRIS MEYERHOF DAN SCHMERTMANN Pasrah Iman Anugerah Putra Ziliwu; Jefri Rahmat Daeli; Kevin Berkat Mendrofa; Ingat Selamat Ziliwu; Andrew christofer Harefa; Putra Jaya Laoli; Dermawan Zebua
Seminar Nasional Ilmu Terapan Vol 9 No 1 (2025): Vol 9 No 1 (2025): Seminar Nasional Ilmu Terapan (SNITER) 2025
Publisher : Universitas Widya Kartika Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan hasil perhitungan daya dukung tanah berdasarkan data uji sondir (Cone Penetration Test) menggunakan dua metode empiris, yaitu Meyerhof dan Schmertmann. Data diperoleh dari pengujian di Lokasi X hingga kedalaman 5,6 meter dengan interval 0,2 meter. Nilai perlawanan konus (qc) digunakan untuk menghitungdaya dukung ultimit (q?????) dan daya dukung izin (q???). Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa daya dukung meningkat seiring kedalaman dan metode Meyerhof menghasilkan nilai yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan Schmertmann dengan selisih sekitar 25–35%. Perbedaan ini disebabkan oleh pendekatan analisis Meyerhof yang lebih sensitif terhadap nilai qc tinggi, sementaraSchmertmann mempertimbangkan deformasi tanah. Berdasarkan interpretasi grafik, lapisan tanah keras ditemukan pada kedalaman sekitar 3–3,5 meter yang direkomendasikan sebagai kedalaman pondasi optimal. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi acuan dalam menentukan daya dukung tanah secara empiris menggunakan data uji sondir. kolom.
Analisis Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Risiko Longsor Amanda Syahfira Zebua; Alfret Eliasman Zalukhu; Putra Jaya Laoli; Bimawijaya Laia
Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, Pendidikan dan Teknik Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): IDENTIK - Maret
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/identik.v3i2.1363

Abstract

Landslides are one of the major hazards in areas with hilly topography and high rainfall, such as Nias Island. Landslide risk is influenced not only by physical environmental factors but also by community perceptions of potential hazards. This study aims to analyze community perceptions of landslide risk in Nias and identify the factors that influence these perceptions. The research employs a quantitative approach with data collection techniques through questionnaires and interviews involving 120 respondents selected randomly from landslide-prone areas. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive and inferential statistics to determine perception levels and relationships between variables. The results indicate that community perception is at a moderate level, with education, experience, and access to information significantly influencing perception levels. Additionally, local wisdom plays an important role in supporting disaster mitigation efforts. Therefore, it is necessary to enhance education, socialization, and community involvement in community-based mitigation programs to improve preparedness for landslide risks in Nias.