Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Jurnal Perspektif Hukum
Anidaul Khanifah
Universitas Tidar
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 135/PUU-XXII/2024 DALAM PERSPEKTIF RADBRUCH: TEGANGAN ANTARA KEADILAN DAN LEGALITAS Anidaul Khanifah; Shanita Nuraini Thaqwim
Jurnal Perspektif Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : Universitas Harapan Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024 introduces a separation between national and regional elections, allowing for a 2–2.5 year gap. This decision opens up space for the extension of regional executive terms or the extension of the appointment of implementing officials without electoral legitimacy, thus creating a constitutional dilemma between formal legality and substantive justice within the Indonesian legal framework. This research uses a normative juridical method with descriptive-qualitative analysis. The analysis shows that this decision reflects a shift in the role of the Constitutional Court from a negative legislator to a positive legislator, raising concerns about constitutional violations and judicial inconsistencies. Furthermore, when examined using Gustav Radbruch's theory of legal objectives, namely justice, certainty, and benefit, that when viewed from a justice perspective, this decision can cause voter fatigue or voter fatigue which ultimately reduces the quality of political participation and the most problematic impact is extending the term of office of regional heads or the appointment of regional heads. So constitutionally it raises serious concerns regarding violations of Article 22E (1) of the 1945 Constitution which states that elections must be held in a Direct, General, Free, Secret, Honest, and Fair manner, within a period of 5 years. Furthermore, seen from the perspective of legal certainty, this decision opens up room for uncertainty because it requires major revisions to the Election Law and the Regional Election Law. Election organizers such as the KPU and Bawaslu must adjust systems, budgets, and technical regulations that do not yet have a clear operational basis. Then, if seen from the perspective of legal benefits, the separation between National Elections and Regional Elections has the potential to create a greater fiscal burden because the state must organize two electoral processes.
Urgensi Rekonstruksi Pengaturan Fungsi Pengawasan DPRD dalam Mewujudkan Checks and Balances pada Pemerintahan Daerah Anidaul Khanifah; Rani Pajrin; Frista Arisa
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Vol 5 No 8 (2026): August
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v5i8.1139

Abstract

Fungsi pengawasan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (DPRD) merupakan wujud prinsip checks and balances sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 12 Tahun 2018. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaturan fungsi pengawasan DPRD, mengidentifikasi kelemahan konstruksi hukumnya, serta merumuskan rekonstruksi pengaturan agar pelaksanaannya lebih optimal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengawasan DPRD terhadap APBD dilakukan sejak tahap perencanaan, penyusunan, pelaksanaan, perubahan, hingga pertanggungjawaban APBD. Sementara itu, pengawasan terhadap peraturan daerah mencakup pelaksanaan substansi perda, kinerja perangkat daerah sebagai pelaksana perda, serta evaluasi efektivitas perda sebagai dasar perubahan, pencabutan, atau pembentukan perda baru. Meskipun telah diatur secara normatif, fungsi pengawasan DPRD belum memiliki pedoman rinci mengenai tata cara, tahapan, indikator, dan instrumen pengawasan sebagai tolok ukur keberhasilan, sehingga tiap DPRD menerapkan mekanisme berbeda sesuai tata tertib masing-masing. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan rekonstruksi pengaturan yang memuat tahapan dan prosedur pengawasan secara sistematis, standar indikator keberhasilan, kewajiban kepala daerah menindaklanjuti rekomendasi DPRD dalam jangka waktu tertentu, akibat hukum yang jelas atas hasil pengawasan, pembatasan ruang lingkup antara pengawasan DPRD, pengawasan internal, dan audit eksternal, serta pedoman operasional pengawasan APBD yang lebih rinci
Co-Authors Frista Arisa Rani Pajrin Shanita Nuraini Thaqwim