Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies Jawahir Al-Ahadis
Maulana Iqbal
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Religion Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Hadis tentang Larangan Maysir terhadap Sistem Gacha pada Game Mobile Legends Maulana Iqbal; Nasrulloh
Jawahir Al-Ahadis Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/jawahir.v2i1.10543

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji sistem gacha dalam permainan Mobile Legends: Bang Bang melalui perspektif hadis tentang larangan maysir. Latar belakang kajian berangkat dari berkembangnya ekonomi digital berbasis transaksi mikro (micro-transaction) yang menghadirkan mekanisme penghargaan berbasis peluang acak (chance-based reward system) dan berpotensi menyerupai praktik perjudian modern. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada integrasi analisis tematik hadis (mawdū'ī) dan fikih muamalah kontemporer guna membedah karakteristik operasional algoritma acak pada permainan digital, guna menilai secara kritis relevansi ‘illat maysir terhadap fenomena digital gaming. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode riset kepustakaan (library research) dengan menelaah secara mendalam hadis-hadis larangan bay‘ al-ḥaṣāt, transaksi gharar, serta permainan dadu (nard) untuk mengidentifikasi unsur ketidakpastian ekstrem, spekulasi, dan kerugian finansial. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa sistem gacha secara substantif memenuhi struktur dasar maysir melalui adanya pengalokasian harta nyata (Diamond), perolehan hasil yang sepenuhnya ditentukan oleh faktor kebetulan, ketidakpastian harga kumulatif komoditas, serta dampak adiksi psikologis. Mekanisme ini secara nyata sejalan dengan ‘illat larangan maysir dalam hadis, yakni pengambilan harta sesama manusia secara batil (akl amwāl al-nās bi al-bāṭil) serta penafian keadilan transaksi. Penelitian ini berkontribusi penting dalam memperluas diskursus fikih digital serta memberikan kerangka normatif bagi konsumen Muslim dalam menghadapi praktik ekonomi spekulatif di ruang publik digital modern
The Pro Bono Legal Aid in Religious Courts and the Constitutional Right to Equality Before the Law: Toward Collective Accountability of Law Enforcement Officers Nikyta Tsabita Khansa; Syaghaf Muhammad Sa’ad; Maulana Iqbal; Musleh Harry
Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Indonesian Islamic Studies (October)
Publisher : Postgraduate Program of the State Islamic Institute of Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/jiis.v5i1.11344

Abstract

Access to justice in Indonesia’s Religious Courts remains structurally constrained, particularly for low-income litigants who frequently navigate divorce, child custody, and inheritance disputes without adequate legal representation. Despite a comprehensive normative framework grounded in Articles 27(1) and 28D (1) of the 1945 Constitution, Law Number 16 of 2011 on Legal Aid, Law Number 50 of 2009 on Religious Courts, and Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2014 concerning Legal Aid Posts (Posbakum), the substantive realization of the constitutional right to equality before the law remains limited in practice. This study examines the constitutional urgency of pro bono legal aid provision in Religious Courts and analyzes how the collective responsibility of law enforcement officers should be conceptualized to ensure its effective implementation. This study employed a normative juridical method using statute and conceptual approaches, supported by primary legal materials, regulatory documents, and scholarly literature. The findings reveal three main points. First, pro bono legal aid constitutes a constitutional obligation rather than a discretionary service, as substantive equality before the law requires the removal of economic, geographic, and informational barriers to justice. Second, the implementation gap in Religious Courts is primarily caused by fragmented institutional responsibility, limited budget allocation, uneven distribution of accredited legal aid institutions, and weak accountability mechanisms. Third, effective legal aid provision requires an integrated collective responsibility framework involving judges, advocates, legal aid institutions, and court registrars as interdependent actors in ensuring access to justice. This study contributes to the literature by reframing pro bono legal aid in Religious Courts as a constitutionally mandated collective responsibility essential to fulfilling equality before the law.
Co-Authors Musleh Harry Nasrulloh Nikyta Tsabita Khansa Syaghaf Muhammad Sa’ad