Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services
Ildar Begishev
Department of Criminal Law and Procedure, Kazan Innovative University
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STEVEDORING LABOR PERFORMANCE IN THE SEA TOLL PROGRAM: INSIGHTS FROM INDONESIA AND THE PHILIPPINES Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom; I Gede Yudi Arsawan; Ildar Begishev
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 27, No 1: April 2025: Customary Law and development in Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study conducts a comparative analysis of stevedoring labor performance within the Sea Toll program in Indonesia and the Philippines, focusing on efficiency, technology, and worker welfare. It aims to identify the key factors influencing the effectiveness of stevedoring labor in both countries. Employing a normative legal method alongside a comparative study approach, the findings indicate that the performance of stevedoring labor in the Philippines is superior to that in Indonesia, particularly regarding work efficiency, technological implementation, and worker welfare. The Philippines has successfully established a skills certification system through the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA), implemented port automation systems such as the Cargo Handling Management System (CHMS) and the Port Community System (PCS), and ensured labor protection in accordance with the Philippine Labor Code and the Occupational Safety and Health Standards (OSHS) Act. In contrast, Indonesia faces significant challenges, including difficulties in implementing skill standards, inadequate port infrastructure, and limited social protection for workers, despite existing regulations such as Law Number 17 of 2008 on Shipping and the Minister of Manpower Decree Number 100 of 2004. Key determinants of stevedoring labor effectiveness include labor regulations, technological availability, training systems, welfare, and work culture. The Philippines has demonstrated greater success in integrating these factors into its operational framework. Therefore, Indonesia could benefit from adopting the Philippines' robust regulatory framework, skills certification system, automation technology, and enhanced worker welfare protections.
Antitrust Law and Legal Advocacy: Perspective on Promoting Fair Competition in Indonesia, Uzbekistan, and Russia Dwi Edi Wibowo; Fradhana Putra Disantara; Bazarova Dildora Baxadirovna; Ildar Begishev
Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Legal Advocacy and Justice Innovation
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijals.v8i1.34027

Abstract

Antitrust law plays a critical role in ensuring fair competition, yet its effectiveness varies across different legal and institutional contexts. This paper examines the comparative regulation and implementation of antitrust law in Indonesia, Uzbekistan, and Russia, with particular attention to the role of legal advocacy and legal services in enhancing compliance and enforcement. The objective is to analyze how these three countries, with distinct political and economic systems, construct and operationalize their competition law frameworks to promote healthy market competition. Employing a normative legal research method with a comparative approach, the study relies on statutory texts, institutional documents, case law, and scholarly literature. Data were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-comparative analysis. The findings reveal that Indonesia has developed a comprehensive legal framework through Law No. 5/1999, yet its enforcement remains inconsistent due to institutional limitations and judicial resistance. Uzbekistan has adopted modern competition principles in its 2012 Competition Law, but enforcement is hindered by state dominance in the economy and limited legal capacity. Russia, in contrast, possesses a mature regulatory framework and a powerful Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS), though enforcement often reflects political considerations. Across all three contexts, legal advocacy and professional legal services significantly influence compliance by educating businesses, guiding merger notifications, and shaping litigation strategies. This study contributes to comparative competition law scholarship by highlighting the interplay between regulation, enforcement, and advocacy in shaping effective competition regimes. The conclusion underscores that building effective antitrust law requires not only robust statutes but also active advocacy and accessible legal services. Recommendations include strengthening compliance mechanisms in Indonesia through KPPU’s DPKPU guidelines, enhancing legal education in Uzbekistan to foster a bottom-up competition culture, and encouraging FAS Russia to sustain transparency in digital markets. 
Co-Authors Bazarova Dildora Baxadirovna Dwi Edi Wibowo Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom Fradhana Putra Disantara I Gede Yudi Arsawan