Bazarova Dildora Baxadirovna
Tashkent State University Of Law

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Legal Politics in Regional Oil and Gas Governance: Toward Sustainable Regulation Dicky Eko Prasetio; Ridwan Arma Subagyo; Oky Sapto Mugi Saputro; Bazarova Dildora Baxadirovna
Indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ijalgov.v1i01.39879

Abstract

Oil and gas exploration and exploitation in Bojonegoro Regency actually creates problems in the form of the absence of statutory regulations that accommodate legal developments and community needs. This research aims to formulate a political, legal and policy orientation so that oil and gas exploration and exploitation in Bojonegoro Regency can provide optimal benefits for the community and is in line with sustainable development. This research is socio-legal or interdisciplinary legal research which examines legal aspects normatively accompanied by analysis based on policy theory. The research results show that the legal implications of the absence of updates to statutory regulations relating to oil and gas exploration and exploitation in Bojonegoro Regency are that philosophically, sociologically and juridically they lack legitimacy and tend to be difficult to implement due to the complexity of the community's legal needs, especially after the passing of the Ciptaker Law. Legal politics related to oil and gas exploration and exploitation in Bojonegoro Regency, namely the need for legal products that are responsive, ecological and progressive in character so that they can be implemented through various policies that are able to make oil and gas exploration and exploitation in Bojonegoro Regency a success as well as the need for revisions to Regional Regulations and Regent Regulations so that in line with the substance of the Ciptaker Law and adapted to actual legal needs in the Bojonegoro community. Keywords: Exploration; Exploitation; Policy; Oil and Gas; Legal Politics.
Tax Reform Through the Reconstruction of Disputes and Law Enforcement Based on the Pancasila Legal Philosophy Radhyca Nanda Pratama; Khaidar Alifika El Ula; Bazarova Dildora Baxadirovna
NOVUM : JURNAL HUKUM Vol. 11 No. 01 (2024): The Ontology and Moral Justification of Law: Protection, Accountability, and
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.2674/novum.v11i01.69708

Abstract

Problems with tax disputes in Indonesia include the burden of cases in the Tax Court that have not been decided and as well as the resolution of tax disputes in two courts, namely the PTUN and the Tax Court. This gives rise to inefficiencies in resolving tax disputes. This research aims to formulate tax reform by reconstructing disputes and enforcing tax law based on the values of Pancasila as the ideals of Indonesian law. This research is normative legal research by prioritizing, prioritizing conceptual, statutory, and comparative approaches. The results of the research show that the urgency of resolving disputes and enforcing tax law which refers to the values of Pancasila as the ideals of Indonesian law is expected to be able to apply the three values in Pancasila, namely deliberation-consensus, the value of efficiency and the value of justice which are expected to be applied used in disputes and enforcement of tax law which is more efficient. Reconstructing disputes and enforcing tax law, which is based on the three main central values in Pancasila, namely the value of deliberation and consensus, the value of efficiency, and the value of justice, requires tax reform through the revision of statutory regulations using the omnibus law method. This requires involves the formulation of the Tax Dispute Law using the omnibus law method, which revises several related laws such as the Tax Court Law, the HPP Law, and various other related associated laws and regulations. In practice, the idea of dispute reconstruction and tax law enforcement needs to be carried out by prioritizing tax mediation, resolving tax disputes in the Tax Court, and optimizing preventive approaches such as e-tax consultation.
Antitrust Law and Legal Advocacy: Perspective on Promoting Fair Competition in Indonesia, Uzbekistan, and Russia Dwi Edi Wibowo; Fradhana Putra Disantara; Bazarova Dildora Baxadirovna; Ildar Begishev
Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Legal Advocacy and Justice Innovation
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijals.v8i1.34027

Abstract

Antitrust law plays a critical role in ensuring fair competition, yet its effectiveness varies across different legal and institutional contexts. This paper examines the comparative regulation and implementation of antitrust law in Indonesia, Uzbekistan, and Russia, with particular attention to the role of legal advocacy and legal services in enhancing compliance and enforcement. The objective is to analyze how these three countries, with distinct political and economic systems, construct and operationalize their competition law frameworks to promote healthy market competition. Employing a normative legal research method with a comparative approach, the study relies on statutory texts, institutional documents, case law, and scholarly literature. Data were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-comparative analysis. The findings reveal that Indonesia has developed a comprehensive legal framework through Law No. 5/1999, yet its enforcement remains inconsistent due to institutional limitations and judicial resistance. Uzbekistan has adopted modern competition principles in its 2012 Competition Law, but enforcement is hindered by state dominance in the economy and limited legal capacity. Russia, in contrast, possesses a mature regulatory framework and a powerful Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS), though enforcement often reflects political considerations. Across all three contexts, legal advocacy and professional legal services significantly influence compliance by educating businesses, guiding merger notifications, and shaping litigation strategies. This study contributes to comparative competition law scholarship by highlighting the interplay between regulation, enforcement, and advocacy in shaping effective competition regimes. The conclusion underscores that building effective antitrust law requires not only robust statutes but also active advocacy and accessible legal services. Recommendations include strengthening compliance mechanisms in Indonesia through KPPU’s DPKPU guidelines, enhancing legal education in Uzbekistan to foster a bottom-up competition culture, and encouraging FAS Russia to sustain transparency in digital markets.