Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

LGBT DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAM DAN MENURUT UUDN 1945 Muzakkir Muzakkir
Al Mashaadir : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol 2, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : STIS Ummul Ayman, Meureudu, Pidie Jaya, Aceh, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52029/jis.v2i1.36

Abstract

This study aims to find out and explain how Indonesian people respond to LGBT behavior practices, how is the concept of Fulfillment of Human Rights in Indonesia for every citizen, how is human rights adopted and in accordance with the context to Indonesia ?, In this study, the author uses an approach case (case approach) and supplemented with literature review. This research is descriptive analytic, which is a method of collecting data and then analyzed using cases, coupled with reference books, legislation, and internet sources to support research. The results showed that the Indonesian people recognized the existence of LGBT that developed in other countries, including its presence in Indonesia, but Indonesian people who were based on religious values and values that lived and developed society could not accept LGBT behavioral practices. Fulfillment of the rights of every citizen does not necessarily without restrictions, including in terms of LGBT practice behavior, the state can provide restrictions in accordance with what has been stipulated in the law, which contains values that live in society. Human rights adopted by Indonesian citizens are limited (particular) not infinite (universal) as has been practiced by western countries.
PIDANA MATI DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERADILAN DI INDONESIA Muzakkir, Faisal A. Rani, Dahlan Ali.
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2, No 2: Mei 2014
Publisher : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (152.175 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The death penalty is a punishment that is imposed by a court or no court , gross misconduct or serious criminal offenses and the death penalty is a component that is related , it is still found to overlap the interpretation and implementation of the judicial power of authority between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court against a provision of law legislation , particularly with regard to capital punishment , and the judiciary has yet to implement fully implement the provisions of the legislation containing the threat of the death penalty and the execution of death row inmate still lead to discrimination and problems , so that it raises issues and legal uncertainty. Research shows that, in the perspective of the Constitutional Court against the death penalty principle that capital punishment is not contrary to the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 . While the Supreme Court in a ruling decided that the death penalty is contrary to the Human Rights and the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 , but there are also other decision affirming the death penalty , so the Supreme Court looks inconsistent . The application of the provisions of the legislation that contains a sentence of death for every criminal there is still discrimination, particularly the imposition of the death penalty is still limited to the crime of murder and terrorism . Process execution on death row there is still a problem , namely the existence of discrimination against the execution of the convict . Konstistusi Court and the Supreme Court as a judicial institution and other relevant state institutions , in every decision and future changes in the Penal Code , relating to the death penalty should be maintained and be consistent . Of the offenses punishable by death , and certain other criminal offenses judiciary is advisable to carry out fully and be objective . As well as the execution process , either period or the rights of death row inmates and the concrete rules should be formulated in a verdict dikontruksikan , so the legal certainty of the execution process , and the rights of death row inmates. Keywords:The Death Penalthy, Justice, Inodesia. Abstrak: Pidana mati adalah hukuman yang dijatuhkan pengadilan terhadap kejahatan berat atau tindak pidana serius. Saat ini masih ditemukan tumpah tindih penafsiran dan pelaksanaan kewenangan kekuasaan kehakiman antara Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan Mahkamah Agung terhadap sebuah ketentuan undang-undang khususnya berkaitan dengan pidana mati, dan lembaga peradilan belum sepenuhnya melaksanakan ketentuan undang-undang yang memuat ancaman berupa pidana mati dan proses eksekusi terhadap terpidana mati masih menimbulkan diskriminasi dan masalah, sehingga hal tersebut menimbulkan masalah dan ketidakpastian hukum.Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, perspektif Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap pidana mati berprinsip bahwa pidana mati tidak bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara RI Tahun 1945. Sedangkan Mahkamah Agung dalam beberapa putusannya memutuskan terlihat tidak konsisten. Penerapan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang memuat ancaman pidana mati bagi setiap pelaku tindak pidana masih terdapat diskriminasi, terutama penjatuhan pidana mati masih terbatas pada pembunuhan berencana dan tindak pidana terorisme. Proses pelaksanaan eksekusi terhadap terpidana mati masih terdapat permasalahan, yaitu adanya diskriminasi, baik jangka waktu maupun pelaksanaan eksekusi terhadap terpidana mati. Mahkamah Konstistusi dan Mahkamah Agung sebagai lembaga peradilan maupun lembaga negara terkait lainnya, disarankan dalam setiap putusan dan dalam perubahan KUHP kedepan, berkaitan dengan pidana mati hendaknya dipertahankan dan bersikap konsisten. Terhadap tindak pidana yang diancam dengan pidana mati dan tindak pidana tertentu lainnya lembaga peradilan disarankan untuk melaksanakan sepenuhnya dan bersikap objektif. Serta proses pelaksanaan eksekusi, baik jangka waktu maupun hak-hak terpidana mati hendaknya dirumuskan aturan konkrit dan dikontruksikan dalam putusan hakim, sehingga adanya kepastian hukum terhadap proses eksekusi dan hak-hak dari terpidana mati. Kata kunci : pidana mati, peradilan, Indonesia.
Legal Aspects of Election Administration Decisions Stages of Vote Counting Recapitulation in Pidie Jaya Regency Zakaria, Muzakkir
Al Mashaadir : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : STIS Ummul Ayman, Meureudu, Pidie Jaya, Aceh, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52029/jis.v5i2.192

Abstract

The 2024 general election in Indonesia is seen as procedurally successful in its implementation. However, if viewed substantially and in terms of fulfilling the aspect of justice, there are still many legal problems. The purpose of the study was to determine the legal aspects of the considerations of the correction decision by Bawaslu RI and the evidence process by Bawaslu Pidie Jaya in handling administrative violations of the recapitulation stage of the vote count of the election. This research is normative legal research, in its implementation it was carried out using a statute approach and a case approach and to strengthen secondary data, the reviewer added field data (field research) for primary data collection by conducting interviews. The results of the study showed the considerations and rulings of Bawaslu RI which stated that the reported party II was not involved and there were no facts stating that Reported Party II had committed an unlawful act according to the Pidie Jaya Regency Bawaslu Decision Number 001 / LP / ADM.PL / BWSL.KAB / 01.22 / III / 2024, according to the Reviewer, the considerations of Bawaslu RI in its decision No. 003/KS/ADM.PL/BWSL/00.00/111/2024 seen from the legal principle only emphasizes the principle of legal certainty alone and ignores the facts that occurred in the field during the recapitulation process of the vote count by ignoring the principle of legal benefit and the verdict of the Indonesian Election Supervisory Body which ordered the PPK to make improvements to the recapitulation of the vote count for DPRK candidates in Bandar Baru District based on C Results-DPRK caused legal problems and in its implementation caused problems. In the decision to handle administrative violations committed by the Pidie Jaya Regency Election Supervisory Body, the examination and evidence process has not been carried out effectively to find trial facts, so improvements are needed in the enforcement of election law in the future to provide justice and legal benefits.
Pendistribusian Zakat Produktif di Baitul Mal Aceh pada Program Beasiswa Satu Keluarga Satu Sarjana (SKSS) Husna, Nurul; Zakaria, Muzakkir; Hadana, Erha Saufan
Glossary : Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah (STIS) Ummul Ayman Pidie Jaya, Ace

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52029/gose.v2i1.214

Abstract

Salah satu program penyaluran zakat produktif di Baitul Mal Aceh yaitu program beasiswa Satu Keluarga Satu Sarjana (SKSS). Namun pada kenyataannya pelaksanaan penyaluran zakat belum mampu menerapkan regulasi yang sudah ada tetapi cenderung kepada tidak terkelola dengan baik.  Penelitian ini bersifat kualitatif dengan tipe penelitian deskriptif analisis yaitu penulis menggunakan metode penelitian lapangan (field research) dan metode penelitian kepustakaan (library research). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme penyaluran zakat produktif pada program SKSS di Baitul Mal Aceh berjalan sesuai dengan keputusan Dewan Pertimbangan Syariah (DPS). Dalam proses penyalurannya melalui beberapa tahapan yaitu   pertama, perencanaan yang dilakukan oleh Baitul Mal Aceh pada program SKSS yaitu menentukan sasaran dan tujuan yang dicapai. Kedua, dalam pelaksanaannya pihak Baitul Mal Aceh melakukan pendataan, menentukan calon mustahiq sesuai dengan syarat dan kriteria,  verifikasi  dan  validasi. Ketiga, dalam pendistribusian pihak Baitul Mal Aceh langsung mentransfer ke rekening mustahiq berupa uang saku perbulan dan uang SPP persemester. Terkait dengan kendala pada program tersebut diantaranya kendala yang bersifat birokrasi yairu regulasi, dalam pencairan dana harus menunggu persetujuan dari anggota legislatif.  Sedangkan menurut hukum Islam terhadap program tersebut yang diambil dari senif ibnu sabil, jumhur ulama kontemporer Yusuf al-Qardhawi memperbolehkan praktek tersebut dengan syarat dan ketentuan.
Polygamy in the Perspective of Contemporary Islamic Law: A Normative and Contextual Analysis of Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid's Thought Erha Saufan Hadana; Muhammad Haikal; Mansari Mansari; Irwansyah Irwansyah; Muzakkir Zakaria; Ikhsan Ikhsan
Syarah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Ekonomi Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): SYARAH : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Ekonomi
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah Universitas Islam Negeri Sultanah Nahrasiyah Lhokseumawe

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47766/syarah.v14i2.6424

Abstract

Polygamy remains a controversial practice in Islamic society in Indonesia, especially when linked to the principles of justice and gender equality. Although Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974 and a number of other regulations have restricted polygamy through administrative and substantive requirements, practices in the field show weak control and numerous procedural violations. This gap between legal norms and social practices demonstrates the failure of the law to provide protection, especially for women. This study aims to analyze the regulation of polygamy in Indonesia from the perspective of Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid's thinking, which emphasizes the importance of maqashid al-syariah as the basis for the validity of Islamic law. This study is a normative legal study with a qualitative approach, through a documentary study of legislation, legal literature, and the thoughts of modern Islamic legal figures. The results of the study show that the regulation of polygamy in Indonesia has not fully integrated the principle of maqashid, both in the substance of the law and in its implementation in court. Legal provisions tend to be legal-formal in nature without addressing the ethical, social, and psychological dimensions of the practice of polygamy. Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid's thinking emphasizes that the permissibility of polygamy must depend on substantive justice, not merely procedural validity. This view offers a critical framework for reforming Islamic family law to be more contextual, responsive, and just. It is important to reform regulations to ensure that the law truly serves as an instrument of protection, not merely a means of legitimizing social inequality.
Legal Aspects of Election Administration Decisions Stages of Vote Counting Recapitulation in Pidie Jaya Regency Muzakkir Zakaria
Al Mashaadir : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : IAI Ummul Ayman, Meureudu, Pidie Jaya, Aceh, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52029/jis.v5i2.192

Abstract

The 2024 general election in Indonesia is seen as procedurally successful in its implementation. However, if viewed substantially and in terms of fulfilling the aspect of justice, there are still many legal problems. The purpose of the study was to determine the legal aspects of the considerations of the correction decision by Bawaslu RI and the evidence process by Bawaslu Pidie Jaya in handling administrative violations of the recapitulation stage of the vote count of the election. This research is normative legal research, in its implementation it was carried out using a statute approach and a case approach and to strengthen secondary data, the reviewer added field data (field research) for primary data collection by conducting interviews. The results of the study showed the considerations and rulings of Bawaslu RI which stated that the reported party II was not involved and there were no facts stating that Reported Party II had committed an unlawful act according to the Pidie Jaya Regency Bawaslu Decision Number 001 / LP / ADM.PL / BWSL.KAB / 01.22 / III / 2024, according to the Reviewer, the considerations of Bawaslu RI in its decision No. 003/KS/ADM.PL/BWSL/00.00/111/2024 seen from the legal principle only emphasizes the principle of legal certainty alone and ignores the facts that occurred in the field during the recapitulation process of the vote count by ignoring the principle of legal benefit and the verdict of the Indonesian Election Supervisory Body which ordered the PPK to make improvements to the recapitulation of the vote count for DPRK candidates in Bandar Baru District based on C Results-DPRK caused legal problems and in its implementation caused problems. In the decision to handle administrative violations committed by the Pidie Jaya Regency Election Supervisory Body, the examination and evidence process has not been carried out effectively to find trial facts, so improvements are needed in the enforcement of election law in the future to provide justice and legal benefits.
Non-Litigation Mechanisms for Resolving Deviant Religious Sect Cases in Aceh: A Sociology of Law Analysis of the Role of the Aceh Ulama Consultative Council Muzakkir Zakaria; Siti Zubaidah Ismail
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 18 No. 2 (2026): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v18i2.13808

Abstract

The enforcement of aqidah law in Aceh, from a normative perspective, should ideally be carried out through formal legal mechanisms that ensure legal certainty, accountability, and the protection of freedom of religion in accordance with the principles of the rule of law and the provisions of Qanun Number 8 of 2015 concerning the Development and Protection of Aqidah. Empirical reality demonstrates that the resolution of deviant sect cases is predominantly conducted through non-litigation mechanisms by the Aceh Ulama Consultative Assembly (Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama/MPU) through fatwas, religious guidance, dialogue, and persuasive religious approaches. This condition reflects a clear gap between das sollen and das sein in the enforcement of aqidah law in Aceh. This study aims to analyze the settlement of deviant sect cases from the perspective of the sociology of law by focusing on the role of the MPU and the social implications arising from the dominance of non-litigation mechanisms. The research employs an empirical legal method with a sociology of law approach through statutory analysis, document analysis, and in-depth interviews with religious leaders and relevant institutional actors. The findings indicate that non-litigation settlement mechanisms are effective in reducing horizontal conflicts, maintaining social stability, and fostering legal compliance based on the legitimacy of ulama and the tradition of deliberative culture within Acehnese society. The dominance of non-litigation mechanisms also has the potential to weaken legal certainty, accountability, and the protection of religious rights if it is not balanced by proportional litigation mechanisms. A balanced integration between religious approaches and formal legal processes constitutes an urgent necessity in the enforcement of aqidah law in Aceh in order to achieve justice that is effective, constitutional, and sustainable.
Integration of Environmental Degradation Issues in Biodiversity Learning in the Primary School Teacher Education Program at Iskandar Muda University Cut Maulina; Nena Puspita Sari; Ruslaini Ruslaini; Muzakkir Zakaria; Fakhri Ramadhan
Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA Vol. 10 No. 2: JUNE 2026
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala, in collaboration with the Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia (PPII), (MoU)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jipi.v10i2.1162

Abstract

The increasing rate of environmental degradation requires the education sector to play a more active role in fostering ecological awareness among younger generations. However, in higher education particularly in the basic science concepts course environmental degradation issues are often not optimally integrated into the learning process, resulting in prospective teachers’ understanding remaining largely conceptual and less contextual. This study aims to analyze the integration of environmental degradation issues into biodiversity learning in the Primary School Teacher Education Program (PGSD) at Iskandar Muda University and to examine its impact on prospective teachers’ conceptual understanding and ecological awareness. The research employed a qualitative approach using a case study design. Data were collected through classroom observations, in-depth interviews with lecturers and prospective teachers, and analysis of instructional documents such as the semester learning plan and teaching materials. The findings reveal that integrating environmental degradation issues into biodiversity learning enhances prospective teachers’ conceptual understanding, strengthens their analytical abilities regarding environmental problems, and fosters greater ecological awareness. Learning that connects scientific concepts with real environmental conditions was found to create a more contextual and meaningful learning experience. The study highlights the importance of developing environment-based pedagogical strategies in teacher education. Therefore, it is recommended that environmental issues be systematically integrated into teacher education curricula to support sustainability-oriented education