Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Colonial Legacy and Strategic HRM in Indonesia's Civil Service: A Southeast Asian Comparison Johanna Novita; Harry Nenobais; Sri Lalanawati Octaviani
Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS Vol 4 No 3 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.11378

Abstract

Bureaucratic reform in Indonesia has substantially modernized administrative procedures; however, improvements in bureaucratic performance remain uneven, suggesting that procedural reform alone cannot resolve persistent institutional constraints. This study aimed to examine the configuration of public-sector human resource management in Indonesia through a comparative analysis of five Southeast Asian administrative systems: Hong Kong, Macau, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines. A qualitative comparative approach was employed using document analysis guided by Berman’s Strategic Human Resource Management framework and historical institutionalism. The findings indicate that Indonesia has achieved considerable procedural modernization in merit-based recruitment through the Computer Assisted Test (CAT), but these advances have not been consistently sustained in bureaucratic neutrality and performance-based compensation. The analysis identifies a pattern of asymmetrical strategic alignment in which recruitment reforms coexist with persistent organizational and institutional constraints across subsequent stages of the civil service career cycle. These constraints are rooted in historically embedded administrative routines that continue to shape authority relations, personnel management, and performance governance. The study extends Strategic Human Resource Management by demonstrating that strategic alignment is institutionally contingent rather than determined solely by the coherence of human resource policies. It concludes that sustainable civil service reform requires institutional transformation beyond procedural modernization, particularly through stronger merit-system governance, enhanced protection of bureaucratic neutrality, and the redesign of performance management toward outcome-oriented evaluation. These findings provide a comparative framework for understanding civil service reform and offer practical guidance for strengthening public-sector human resource governance in Indonesia.
Public Service Co-Production and Outcomes: Conceptual Review and Evidence-Based Research Agenda Sri Lalanawati Octaviani; Harry Nenobais; Johanna Novita
Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS Vol 4 No 3 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.11492

Abstract

Public service co-production has emerged as a prominent paradigm in contemporary public administration as governments increasingly adopt collaborative approaches to addressing complex societal challenges. However, existing scholarship remains fragmented, frequently emphasizing isolated dimensions such as citizen participation, governance mechanisms, or implementation practices, while comprehensive syntheses integrating conceptual development, theoretical foundations, operational processes, governance challenges, and future research directions remain limited. This study aimed to develop an integrated conceptual understanding of public service co-production and formulate an evidence-based research agenda through a qualitative conceptual review. The study employed document analysis and thematic content analysis, using The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes, comprising 36 chapters authored by leading scholars in the field, as the primary data source. Data were collected through systematic document examination and analyzed through thematic coding and interpretative synthesis. Seven major themes emerged: the conceptual spectrum of co-production, public value outcomes, the Four Co’s operational cycle, implementation and leadership, governance challenges, citizen inclusion and motivation, and future research directions. The findings indicate that co-production has evolved into a multidimensional governance paradigm centered on collaborative public value creation through active interaction among governments, citizens, communities, and other stakeholders. This study contributes to public administration scholarship by consolidating fragmented perspectives into an integrated conceptual framework and proposing a research agenda for advancing theoretical and empirical inquiry. Practically, the findings offer guidance for policymakers and public managers in designing more inclusive, collaborative, and citizen-centered public service systems. Future research should undertake comparative empirical studies across policy sectors and governance contexts while examining the implications of digital transformation and artificial intelligence for public service co-production.
Beyond One-Size-Fits-All: Context-Sensitive Approaches to Local Government Improvement in Developing Countries Rahmat Aminullah Muhadli; Harry Nenobais; Johanna Novita
Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS Vol 4 No 3 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.11605

Abstract

Although context-sensitive approaches to local governance have received increasing attention in development studies and comparative public administration, research integrating structural, relational, and normative dimensions across developing-country contexts remains limited. This study aimed to examine how contextual conditions shape local government improvement and to develop an integrative theoretical framework explaining variations in local governance outcomes across developing countries. A qualitative comparative theoretical synthesis was conducted using the literature compiled by de Vries, Reddy, and Haque (2008), supplemented by relevant empirical and theoretical studies published between 2008 and 2023. The analysis encompassed evidence from Latin America, Sub-Saharan Africa, and South Asia and focused on three interrelated dimensions: structural conditions, relational dynamics, and normative conditions. The findings indicate that formal decentralization does not automatically produce equivalent improvements in local government capacity or performance. Instead, governance outcomes vary according to fiscal and administrative capacity, intergovernmental relations, territorial and institutional configurations, citizen participation, and the involvement of non-state actors. The synthesis further demonstrates that community-centred, state-centred, market-centred, radical, and network perspectives each explain important yet partial dimensions of local governance. Integrating these perspectives, the study proposes a multi-centred theory of local governance that combines local autonomy and accountability, context-sensitive central oversight, conditional market mechanisms, multi-actor collaboration, and sensitivity to institutional and territorial conditions. The study concludes that local government improvement requires governance reforms adapted to specific political, institutional, social, fiscal, and territorial contexts rather than the uniform replication of standardized best practices. This study contributes an integrative framework for comparative local governance research and provides practical guidance for policymakers and development institutions in designing context-sensitive decentralization and local government reforms. Future research should empirically test and refine the proposed framework across a broader range of local government settings.