Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Colonial Legacy and Strategic HRM in Indonesia's Civil Service: A Southeast Asian Comparison Johanna Novita; Harry Nenobais; Sri Lalanawati Octaviani
Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS Vol 4 No 3 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.11378

Abstract

Bureaucratic reform in Indonesia has substantially modernized administrative procedures; however, improvements in bureaucratic performance remain uneven, suggesting that procedural reform alone cannot resolve persistent institutional constraints. This study aimed to examine the configuration of public-sector human resource management in Indonesia through a comparative analysis of five Southeast Asian administrative systems: Hong Kong, Macau, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines. A qualitative comparative approach was employed using document analysis guided by Berman’s Strategic Human Resource Management framework and historical institutionalism. The findings indicate that Indonesia has achieved considerable procedural modernization in merit-based recruitment through the Computer Assisted Test (CAT), but these advances have not been consistently sustained in bureaucratic neutrality and performance-based compensation. The analysis identifies a pattern of asymmetrical strategic alignment in which recruitment reforms coexist with persistent organizational and institutional constraints across subsequent stages of the civil service career cycle. These constraints are rooted in historically embedded administrative routines that continue to shape authority relations, personnel management, and performance governance. The study extends Strategic Human Resource Management by demonstrating that strategic alignment is institutionally contingent rather than determined solely by the coherence of human resource policies. It concludes that sustainable civil service reform requires institutional transformation beyond procedural modernization, particularly through stronger merit-system governance, enhanced protection of bureaucratic neutrality, and the redesign of performance management toward outcome-oriented evaluation. These findings provide a comparative framework for understanding civil service reform and offer practical guidance for strengthening public-sector human resource governance in Indonesia.
Public Service Co-Production and Outcomes: Conceptual Review and Evidence-Based Research Agenda Sri Lalanawati Octaviani; Harry Nenobais; Johanna Novita
Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS Vol 4 No 3 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.11492

Abstract

Public service co-production has emerged as a prominent paradigm in contemporary public administration as governments increasingly adopt collaborative approaches to addressing complex societal challenges. However, existing scholarship remains fragmented, frequently emphasizing isolated dimensions such as citizen participation, governance mechanisms, or implementation practices, while comprehensive syntheses integrating conceptual development, theoretical foundations, operational processes, governance challenges, and future research directions remain limited. This study aimed to develop an integrated conceptual understanding of public service co-production and formulate an evidence-based research agenda through a qualitative conceptual review. The study employed document analysis and thematic content analysis, using The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes, comprising 36 chapters authored by leading scholars in the field, as the primary data source. Data were collected through systematic document examination and analyzed through thematic coding and interpretative synthesis. Seven major themes emerged: the conceptual spectrum of co-production, public value outcomes, the Four Co’s operational cycle, implementation and leadership, governance challenges, citizen inclusion and motivation, and future research directions. The findings indicate that co-production has evolved into a multidimensional governance paradigm centered on collaborative public value creation through active interaction among governments, citizens, communities, and other stakeholders. This study contributes to public administration scholarship by consolidating fragmented perspectives into an integrated conceptual framework and proposing a research agenda for advancing theoretical and empirical inquiry. Practically, the findings offer guidance for policymakers and public managers in designing more inclusive, collaborative, and citizen-centered public service systems. Future research should undertake comparative empirical studies across policy sectors and governance contexts while examining the implications of digital transformation and artificial intelligence for public service co-production.