Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Computing Theories and Applications Jurnal Komputer dan Teknologi Informasi
Ahmad Ilham
Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Implementasi Metode Agile Development pada Sistem Administrasi Pelayanan Surat Menyurat Mahasiswa di Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang Siti Munawaroh; Akhmad Fathurrohman; Ahmad Ilham
JURNAL KOMPUTER DAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI Vol 4, No 2 (2026): (JULI) | Perancangan Perangkat Lunak
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26714/jkti.v4i2.20724

Abstract

Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi sangat krusial bagi efisiensi operasional institusi pendidikan. Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang (Unimus) menghadapi tantangan dalam pelayanan surat menyurat di Biro Administrasi Akademik Kemahasiswaan (BAAK) yang masih dilakukan secara manual, menyebabkan antrean fisik dan lambatnya pemrosesan data. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan aplikasi pelayanan surat menyurat berbasis website untuk meningkatkan mutu dan efektivitas layanan. Metode pengembangan sistem menggunakan Agile Development dengan bahasa pemrograman PHP, framework Laravel, dan basis data MySQL. Pengujian fungsionalitas dilakukan menggunakan Black Box Testing. Hasil penelitian ini adalah sistem administrasi yang memfasilitasi empat peran pengguna. Implementasi sistem terbukti meningkatkan efisiensi dan transparansi administrasi, di mana mahasiswa dapat memantau status pengajuan secara real-time tanpa kehadiran fisik.
Transformer-Based Support for Content-Validity Pre-Screening in Educational Materials Safuan Safuan; Dhendra Marutho; Ahmad Ilham; Muhammad Munsarif; Wendy Sarasjati; Edy Winarno; Arnold Adimabua Ojugo; De Rosal Ignatius Moses Setiadi
Journal of Computing Theories and Applications Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): JCTA 4(1) 2026
Publisher : Universitas Dian Nuswantoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62411/jcta.16829

Abstract

Content validity assessment is essential for determining whether educational materials adequately represent intended learning outcomes. However, conventional assessment procedures require substantial expert time and may produce inconsistent decisions across large item collections. This study develops a transformer-based framework to support content-validity pre-screening through two complementary tasks: predicting expert-derived Aiken’s V coefficients and classifying instructional-item essentiality. The final dataset comprised 652 Indonesian-language educational text items independently evaluated by four subject-matter experts. To reduce information leakage, identical and normalized-equivalent texts were grouped before applying a group-aware 70:15:15 training–validation–test split. Classical TF-IDF-based baselines were compared with IndoBERT, multilingual BERT, XLM-RoBERTa, and multilingual DeBERTa-v3. For Aiken’s V regression, multilingual BERT achieved the lowest MAE of 0.0501, the lowest RMSE of 0.0625, and the highest R² of 0.5239, whereas multilingual DeBERTa-v3 achieved the highest Spearman correlation of 0.7532. For essentiality classification, XLM-RoBERTa achieved the highest accuracy of 0.8557 and Macro-F1 of 0.8161, whereas multilingual BERT achieved the highest balanced accuracy of 0.8135 and ROC-AUC of 0.9111. Error analysis showed that the models captured textual patterns associated with expert-derived outcomes but remained limited when judgments depended on broader curricular context, competency hierarchies, prerequisite relationships, or relationships among instructional items. The findings support the use of transformer models as human-in-the-loop decision-support tools for prioritizing uncertain or potentially problematic educational items. However, the framework should be interpreted as a pre-screening mechanism rather than a replacement for expert judgment, and external validation across institutions and disciplines remains necessary.
Co-Authors Akhmad Fathurrohman Arnold Adimabua Ojugo De Rosal Ignatius Moses Setiadi Dhendra Marutho Edy Winarno Muhammad Munsarif Safuan Safuan Siti Munawaroh Wendy Sarasjati