Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

HUMAN PIG HEART TRANSPLANT: APPLICATION OF ABDULLAH SAEED'S CONTEXTUAL APPROACH TO QS. AL MAIDAH VERSE 3 Nurmansyah, Ihsan; Oktaviana, Sherli Kurnia; Azid, Muhammad Adam Abd.
QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): August
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/qist.v2i2.1469

Abstract

This paper discusses the contextualization of QS. al-Maidah: 3 regarding pig heart transplants in humans. This practice has become an interesting and viral issue on social media because a few months ago in the United States there was a medical finding about a pig heart transplant in humans which was successfully tested on the world's first patient. In responding to this there are differences of opinion, some allow and do not allow, of course it is very much influenced by the understanding of the text. Therefore, it is very important to review the interpretation of the text using Abdullah Saeed's contextual approach. The results of this study: 1) From a linguistic analysis point of view, the word khinzir means pig. Judging from the micro-macro asbab an-nuzul, pigs are not found in the midst of the Arab nation's historical life. 2) the interpretation of scholars from generation to generation towards the word lahmun khinzir has two main points. First, it is forbidden to eat pork. Second, the use of pig heart valves as a substitute for diseased human heart valves can be justified in an emergency. 3) contextualization. The use of pig heart in human heart transplantation is prohibited as long as there are other efforts that can be cured medically. However, if it is an emergency in order to protect one's life, then it is permissible on the condition that the recovery can only be done by means of a transplant and only done by a trusted specialist doctor.
Peningkatan Kesadaran Anti Bullying melalui Peer Group Teknik Sosiodrama pada Siswa SMP Syifa, Abdullah; Nugraha, Wira; Oktaviana, Sherli Kurnia
Prima Abdika: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Volume 5 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025 (Juni)
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Universitas Flores Ende

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37478/abdika.v5i2.5175

Abstract

This community service aims to examine the impact of the sociodrama program in addressing bullying behavior at SMPN 1 Anjongan. The sociodrama program was implemented as a preventive and intervention effort to reduce bullying and increase students' awareness of the importance of empathy and appreciating differences. The sociodrama method was used to form anti-bullying peer groups, which serve as agents of change in creating a safe and conducive learning environment at school. This service reveals that the implementation of sociodrama significantly increases students' awareness of the impact of bullying on perpetrators, victims, and bystanders. In addition, this program has successfully formed peer groups that support prosocial behavior and address negative behavior. Other positive impacts include the creation of a more inclusive and harmonious school atmosphere, with increased solidarity among students and active participation in bullying prevention. Furthermore, teachers involved in this program have also acquired new skills in addressing bullying issues and integrating character education into daily learning. This program demonstrates that experience-based approaches such as sociodrama can be an effective method in building an anti-bullying school culture and improving the quality of character education in schools.
KONSEP UMMAH WĀHIDAH DALAM AL-QUR’AN DAN RELEVANSINYA DENGAN KONTEKS KEKINIAN: Studi Komparatif Penafsiran Hamka dan Kementerian Agama RI Nurmansyah, Ihsan; Oktaviana, Sherli Kurnia; Annisa, Nur
AL ITQAN: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an Vol 8 No 2 (2022): Al ITQAN: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an
Publisher : STAI AL-ANWAR SARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47454/alitqan.v8i2.818

Abstract

Basically Muslims around the world are ummah wahidah. But in reality, some Muslims actually conflict with each other and are divided due to differences in opinions, views, by blaming each other and disbelief. Therefore, how do the concepts of the two interpretations written by Hamka and the Ministry of Religion RI respond to this problem, where the two interpretations discuss about society. The method used is the comparative method. The results of this study are 1) Hamka and the Ministry of Religion RI agree in interpreting ummah wahidah as one belief in monotheism and one who likes to do good. Both of them provide a way to realize ummah wahidah by returning to the book that contains the truth and mentioning the factors that become obstacles to the realization of ummah wahidah, namely envy. The difference is, in explaining the meaning, constraints and ways of realizing ummah wahidah, Hamka is more detailed, while the Ministry of Religion RI is simpler; 2) The ummah wahidah offered by Hamka and Ministry of Religion RI is still very relevant to the current context. From the two books of his commentary, he provides a solution so that Muslims adhere to the Al-Quran and as-Sunnah. Meanwhile, Hamka specifically provides a way for humans to return to their unity by finding common ground that refers to good values, even as a means to compete in goodness; 3) The implication is that Muslims must change their mindset and be mature to accept the differences that exist.