Muhamad Noval Faris Pratama
Universitas Esa Unggul

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis Kelalaian dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Kebakaran Hutan di Gunung Bromo Akibat Flare Prewedding: Studi Putusan No. 305/Pid.B/Lh/2023/Pn Krs Farida Nurun Nazah; Karindra Alvian Nugraha; Syifa Ramadani Ramadani; Muhamad Noval Faris Pratama; Nayla Azzahra Khaerunnisa; Talitha Maheswari Ning Atmojo
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 11 (2026): Tema Hukum Lingkungan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i11.4111

Abstract

This study analyzes the element of negligence (culpa) and criminal liability in a forest fire case at Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park caused by a prewedding flare, based on Decision No. 305/Pid.B/LH/2023/PN Krs. Using normative legal methods with statutory and case approaches, the findings prove culpa through flare use in a dry savanna without risk mitigation, with a clear causal link. Criminal liability rests on fulfilled offense elements, culpa lata, culpability and no grounds for excuse. This decision affirms criminal sanctions for negligence causing ecological damage. It is recommended that judges explicitly distinguish negligence qualifications in their considerations to strengthen legal certainty.
Reinterpretasi Kedaulatan Negara Atas Wilayah Udara dalam Konteks Kerja Sama Pertahanan Internasional: Studi Kasus Overflight Clearance Luthy Yustika; Mochamad Yulian Fadhli Saputra; Muhamad Noval Faris Pratama; Ahmad Jafar Sidik; Owen Novail Firmansyah; Astri Anggraeni Putri; Talitha Kamilah
Sinar Dunia: Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): September: Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Publisher : Universitas Maritim AMNI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58192/sidu.v5i3.5348

Abstract

The shift in the concept of state sovereignty over airspace amidst the dynamic evolution of international defense cooperation, specifically focusing on the implementation of overflight clearance. Employing a normative legal research method with a literature study approach, this paper examines the alignment between the principle of complete and exclusive sovereignty under Article 1 of the 1944 Chicago Convention and the operational efficiency needs of joint military activities. The findings indicate that the bureaucratic rigidity of traditional ad hoc diplomatic overflight clearances often creates strategic bottlenecks in modern defense diplomacy. Consequently, a paradigm shift has emerged, transitioning from a defensive-exclusive sovereignty toward a more adaptive framework. Pre-conditioning airspace access through institutionalized agreements, such as Status of Forces Agreements or Defense Cooperation Agreements (DCA) (Shaw, 2017), does not diminish state sovereignty. Instead, it serves as a legitimate manifestation of state sovereignty based on consent, successfully balancing national security with global defense interoperability. These findings carry significant implications for the development of national air law policies in response to contemporary geopolitical security landscapes. States are required to formulate precise domestic regulatory frameworks to accommodate military alliance needs without undermining national oversight and territorial integrity. Thus, this approach ensures that defense cooperation operates effectively, structurally, and accountably.