Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi (JIEE) Jurnal Imiah Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat (JIPM)
Defika Yufiandra
Universitas Dharma Andalas
Religion Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Sosialisasi Penggunaan Gadget yang Bijak pada Anak Sekolah Dasar di Rt 01/Rw 02 Kelurahan Simpang Haru, Kecamatan Padang Timur Kota Padang Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Ketahanan Nasional Elwidarifa Marwenny; Indrayeni Indrayeni; Defika Yufiandra; Naya Klaresa; Abelto Abelto; Riska Aulia; Balqis Darratul Hikmah; Haril Aditya Nasfi; Intan Elsa Tri Dermawan; Oktria Oktria; Khairunisa Khairunisa; Afifah Saidah; Agung Hartanto; Bagas Al'kautsar
Jurnal Imiah Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat (JIPM) Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Juli - September
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Rapidly increasing access to technology among elementary school children presents distinct challenges, ranging from the risk of digital addiction and exposure to negative content to a decline in social interaction—factors that could potentially erode character values ​​and national resilience. This community service initiative aims to enhance elementary-aged children's understanding and awareness regarding the wise, safe, and responsible use of digital devices. The outreach activity was conducted in the RT 01/RW 02 neighborhood of Simpang Haru Urban Village, East Padang District, Padang City. An educational and participatory approach was employed, featuring interactive talks using accessible language, two-way discussions, educational games (ice-breakers), and the reinforcement of digital ethics grounded in local Minangkabau wisdom. Participant understanding was evaluated through oral quizzes and interactive Q&A sessions at the conclusion of the event. The activity met with great enthusiasm from the participants. Most children were able to understand and articulate the benefits of devices for learning, the negative impacts of excessive use, the importance of healthy usage limits, and appropriate actions to take when encountering negative online content. This initiative successfully fostered early digital literacy, serving as a foundation for character building among the younger generation to support national resilience in the digital era.
The Scope of Anti-SLAPP Protection and Judicial Independence in Environmental Law Enforcement: A Construction Following Constitutional Court Decision Number 119/PUU-XXIII/2025 Defika Yufiandra; Bagas Al'kautsar; Elwidarifa Marwenny; Widya Roza
Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69989/hd2xpa24

Abstract

This article examines the limits of Anti-Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (Anti-SLAPP) protection and its relationship with judicial independence in environmental law enforcement in Indonesia. The central issue is how protection for environmental defenders can be implemented effectively without becoming an absolute immunity that eliminates the judiciary's function of adjudicating cases. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, case, and limited comparative approaches. The findings show that Article 66 of Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management provides a substantive basis for protection, while Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2023 and Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation No. 10 of 2024 have begun to establish operational mechanisms. Constitutional Court Decision No. 119/PUU-XXIII/2025 broadens the protected subjects from a formulation previously perceived as limited to victims and/or complainants to every person, including witnesses, experts, activists, and other parties participating in environmental protection. This article argues that the limits of Anti-SLAPP protection should be formulated through a threshold test encompassing a causal nexus with public participation, environmental public interest, indications of retaliation, good faith, and the principles of necessity and proportionality. Under this framework, Anti-SLAPP does not conflict with judicial independence; rather, it operates as a corrective mechanism to prevent the courts from being used to suppress public participation.
Co-Authors Abelto Abelto Afifah Saidah Agung Hartanto Bagas Al'kautsar Bagas Al'kautsar Balqis Darratul Hikmah Haril Aditya Nasfi Indrayeni Indrayeni Intan Elsa Tri Dermawan Khairunisa Khairunisa Marwenny, Elwidarifa Naya Klaresa Oktria Oktria Riska Aulia Widya Roza