stefie yuliandra
UPN Veteran Jakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

the The Roots of Corruption in Indonesia and Singapore: Building Real Anti-Corruption Solutions stefie yuliandra; Abror Jilan Yankusy; Selma Dwi Anaya Pebriyanti; Aliya Sari
Journal of Ius Comparatum Law Studies Vol 1 No 1 (2025): Comparative Studies on Law Perspective
Publisher : Faculty of Law |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jicls.v1i1.10826

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia is a serious problem that continues to hamper national development, undermine public trust in government, and cause huge losses to society. Although various regulations have been implemented, corrupt practices remain rampant in various sectors. This paper discusses the main causes of corruption in Indonesia, including weak oversight systems, low transparency, lack of individual integrity, permissive legal culture, and weak law enforcement. One of the root causes identified is excessive interest in material wealth, weak internal and external legal culture, and lack of transparency in financial management and public policy. The case study of the PT Pertamina Patra Niaga scandal shows gaps in the supervisory system and the ineffectiveness of regulations in preventing corruption. In comparison, Singapore's success in curbing corruption is referenced, with an emphasis on the principle of zero tolerance, the use of modern technology, monitoring of officials' assets, and public participation. From this analysis, several solutions are recommended for Indonesia, including strengthening the independence of law enforcement agencies, applying advanced technology in surveillance, increasing transparency, and providing decent salaries for public officials to reduce incentives for corruption. In conclusion, eradicating corruption requires a holistic approach that includes reforming the legal system, increasing public awareness, and strict supervision in all strategic sectors.
ANALISIS DASAR PERTIMBANGAN MAJELIS HAKIM DAN IMPLIKASI ATAS PENGABULAN GUGATAN CERAI OLEH PENGADILAN AGAMA JAKARTA TIMUR (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 5374/Pdt.G/2025/PA.JT) Suci Trianjani; Stefie Yuliandra; Yasinta Diva Negara
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Volume 5, Nomor 2, April 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Divorce is a form of resolving marital disputes that may only be granted when the legal grounds stipulated by law have been fulfilled. This study aims to analyze the legal considerations of the panel of judges in granting a divorce petition and its legal implications in Decision Number 5374/Pdt.G/2025/PA.JT. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches. The findings indicate that the panel of judges granted the divorce petition due to continuous disputes and conflicts, the husband's failure to fulfill his financial support obligations, the defendant's involvement in online loans, and the parties' separation for more than two years. These considerations were based on Article 39 paragraph (2) of the Marriage Law in conjunction with Article 19 letter (f) of Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975 and Article 116 letter (f) of the Compilation of Islamic Law. The decision resulted in the dissolution of the marriage through a talak satu ba'in sughra. Although formally consistent with applicable legal provisions, the decision still raises concerns regarding the quality of evidence, the default judgment procedure (verstek), and the insufficient protection of women's rights and the best interests of children after divorce. Keywords: Divorce Lawsuit, Judicial Considerations, Broken Marriage, Talak Ba'in Sughra, Religious Court.