Noorfajri Ismail
Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Sains Islam Malaysia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Balancing Independence and Accountability: Reforming Prosecutorial Immunity in Indonesia’s Legal System Zuraidah zuraidah; Edi Setiadi; Neni Rohaeni; Noorfajri Ismail
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 26 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v26i1.27541

Abstract

This research examines the juridical implications of Article 8 paragraph (5) of Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Indonesian Attorney General’s Office, which stipulates that any legal action against prosecutors such as summons, detention, search, and interrogation must be approved by the Attorney General. While the provision was originally intended to safeguard institutional independence, its application has raised serious concerns regarding the erosion of the equality before the law principle and the emergence of internal impunity mechanisms. Using a normative juridical approach combined with statutory, conceptual, and case study methods, this study analyses the extent to which Article 8(5) contradicts the principles of a democratic rule of law, particularly due process of law, equality before the law, and institutional accountability. Several high-profile case studies involving prosecutors such as Pinangki Sirna Malasari and Urip Tri Gunawan illustrate the operational obstacles and legal stagnation created by this hierarchical authorization requirement. The study finds that the provision creates structural barriers to justice and fosters unequal treatment under the law. Reformulating Article 8(5) into a notification mechanism rather than a permission system would ensure a more balanced relationship between institutional protection and legal accountability. Significantly, this research contributes to the development of legal thought on prosecutorial reform by offering a normative framework that strengthens equality before the law and provides policy recommendations for enhancing transparency and accountability within Indonesia’s prosecution system.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika: Studi Kasus Penyalahgunaan Ganja di Indonesia Amanda Roshita Aly Ashany; Noorfajri Ismail; Saleh Saleh
UMPurwokerto Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/umplr.v5i2.27124

Abstract

Penyalahgunaan narkoba, khususnya ganja, telah menjadi salah satu persoalan krusial dalam bidang hukum, kesehatan, dan sosial di Indonesia. Berdasarkan data Badan Narkotika Nasional (BNN), tercatat sebanyak 6.881 kasus tindak pidana narkotika terjadi pada Januari hingga Februari 2025, menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan terhadap prevalensi penyalahgunaan narkotika golongan I sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis penyalahgunaan narkoba dan ganja dari perspektif kriminologi dan viktimologi dengan menyoroti faktor penyebab, karakteristik pelaku, serta perlindungan hukum bagi korban. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif berbasis studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyalahgunaan ganja umumnya disebabkan oleh faktor kepribadian, lingkungan sosial, serta lemahnya kontrol hukum. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan upaya penegakan hukum terpadu dan rehabilitasi yang berkeadilan guna melindungi generasi muda dari bahaya ketergantungan narkotika.