Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam
Putri, Eka Desiana
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
KIP-K Scholarship Eligibility for Economically Established Students: Perspectives of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama Figures Qomariyah, Nurul; Putri, Eka Desiana; Aziz, Muhammad Irfan; Musafa'ah, Suqiyah
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v6i1.3171

Abstract

The Indonesia Smart College Card Scholarship (KIP-K) is an assistance program organized by the government with the aim of easing the burden of education costs for students from underprivileged families. However, in practice, many underprivileged students receive KIP-K scholarships. This study examines in depth the comparative analysis of the views of NU and Muhammadiyah figures regarding the provision of KIP scholarships to underprivileged students. This type of research is a normative-empirical law with a descriptive-comparative approach. Data was obtained through literature studies and in-depth interviews with figures from Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama. The data were analyzed comparatively. The results of the study show a difference in approach between Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) figures regarding the ethics of the utilization of scholarship, especially the KIP-K program. Muhammadiyah leaders tend to emphasize a normative, procedural approach grounded in maqāṣid al-syarī'ah, particularly the principles of ḥifẓ al-'aql (safeguarding reason) and ḥifẓ al-māl (safeguarding property). Meanwhile, NU figures highlight aspects of social ethics and pesantren values, such as honesty, trust, and social responsibility. The similarity between the two lies in the understanding that scholarship is a mandate that must be used honestly and on target, and that any deviation is a violation of Islamic law. Both Muhammadiyah and NU leaders view the act of receiving scholarships illegally as a form of deprivation of rights that are not justified by morality and Islamic law.
Co-Authors Aziz, Muhammad Irfan Nurul Qomariyah Suqiyah Musafaah