Angga Gustian Widodo
Universitas Islam Bandung

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Ambivalensi Politik Hukum dalam Sistem Pemilu: Analisis Orientasi Perubahan Undang-Undang Pemilu di Indonesia Muhamad Iqbal Ansori Firdaus; Lisda Apriliani Sobirin; Angga Gustian Widodo; Dian Hadiana; Riswandi; Janetra Adiel Maulana Ikhsan
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Siyasi: Jurnal Trias Politica (In Press)
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tatanegara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v4i2.57229

Abstract

This research aims to answer questions regarding how legal politics orientation underlies changes in Indonesia's electoral system, how the character of legal politics ambivalence in elections is identified, and how the Constitutional Court's role shapes the consistency of electoral legal policy direction following judicial review decisions. This research employs doctrinal legal research methods with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, through analysis of the 1945 Constitution, Law Number 7 of 2017, and Constitutional Court decisions related to the electoral system. The results show that Indonesia's electoral legal politics orientation is dualistic between strengthening democracy and power stabilization interests, reflected in the consistent increase of the parliamentary threshold from 2 percent to 4 percent. This ambivalence is evident in representation disproportionality due to wasted votes, gaps in women's representation, and weak enforcement of affirmative policies. The Constitutional Court has proven to play an evolutive role, shifting from being defensive toward open legal policy to more actively conducting substantive corrections, as demonstrated by Decision Number 62/PUU-XXII/2024 which abolished the presidential threshold. These findings affirm the need to reorient electoral legal politics toward strengthening substantive democracy and more inclusive political representation in Indonesia.
Politik Hukum Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Kontemporer Irda Nur Khumaeroh; Muhamad Iqbal Ansori Firdaus; Angga Gustian Widodo; Fitri Khoirotunnisa; Tessa Marshandini Sofyan; Jalaludin
SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tatanegara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/sjtp.v3i2.57877

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal politics of Indonesia's criminal justice system from the perspective of contemporary constitutional law and to formulate the direction of its transformation toward a democratic, accountable, and substantively just system. The study employs a normative-doctrinal legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials were collected through systematic library research and analyzed qualitatively using legal interpretation, norm synchronization, legal construction, and deductive reasoning techniques. The findings reveal that Indonesia's criminal justice legal politics faces three mutually reinforcing structural deficits: a regulatory deficit stemming from disharmony among statutes, an integration deficit arising from institutional fragmentation among the police, prosecution, judiciary, and correctional subsystems, and an oversight deficit due to weak checks and balances mechanisms. A comparative analysis with Germany and the Netherlands demonstrates a significant gap in due process implementation and constitutional rights protection. Transformation must prioritize regulatory harmonization, strengthening the integrated criminal justice system, and establishing independent oversight mechanisms to ensure Indonesia's criminal justice system genuinely delivers constitutional justice for all citizens.