Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal GUYUB: Journal of Community Engagement Siber Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary
Daman Arsa Nova
Universitas Riau Kepulauan
Religion Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mechanical Engineering Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Principle of Objectivity in the Discretionary Powers of Municipal Police (Satpol PP): An Administrative Law Analysis of Regional Regulation Enforcement Daman Arsa Nova; Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti; Dwi Afni Maileni
Siber Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Siber Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary (July - September 2026)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Research & Yayasan Sinergi Inovasi Bersama (SIBER)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/sjam.v4i2.1024

Abstract

Abstract: The enforcement of Regional Regulations by the Civil Service Police Unit (Satpol PP) frequently involves the exercise of discretionary authority due to regulatory gaps, ambiguous norms, and complex field conditions. However, such discretion carries the risk of arbitrariness and abuse of authority if it is not guided by clear legal standards. This article examines how the principle of objectivity functions as a legal benchmark in the exercise of Satpol PP discretion under Indonesian administrative law. Using normative legal research with statute, conceptual, and limited case approaches, the study analyzes the framework of Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration, Law No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government, Government Regulation No. 16 of 2018 on Satpol PP, relevant administrative law doctrines, and judicial interpretations. The analysis demonstrates that discretionary authority is lawful only when it is grounded in verifiable facts, rational decision-making, impartial treatment of similar cases, careful consideration of risks and impacts, and transparent reason-giving supported by adequate documentation. The study concludes that objectivity operates as an operational legal standard that transforms the abstract principles of good governance (AUPB) into measurable criteria for evaluating Satpol PP enforcement actions. By formulating indicators such as factual basis, rationality, non-partisanship, due care, and transparency, this research provides a normative framework for assessing whether discretionary enforcement actions are consistent with legality, proportionality, and accountability within the rule-of-law and good governance framework
Legal Awareness Lab: Penguatan Kesadaran Hukum Pekerja Migran Indonesia melalui Simulasi Dilema dan Komitmen Preventif Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti; Anto Anto; Daman Arsa Nova; Irma Solvia; Evy Yusriani
GUYUB: Journal of Community Engagement Vol 7, No 3 (2026): September
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/guyub.v7i3.16517

Abstract

Abstract. Legal awareness among Indonesian Migrant Workers (PMI) needs to be strengthened because knowledge of legal rules is not always accompanied by the ability to recognize risks, assess consequences, and determine safe actions when facing pressure in employment relationships. The urgency of this activity lies in the normalization of risky practices, such as surrendering personal documents, accepting employment changes without written evidence, making payments without documentation, and using unverified intermediaries. This community engagement activity aimed to strengthen PMI’s legal awareness and readiness for preventive behavior through the Student Community Engagement Program of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Riau Kepulauan, at the Embassy of the Republic of Indonesia in Malaysia. The activity was conducted from 16 to 19 July 2026 and involved six participants. The method employed a dilemma-based legal awareness laboratory and behavioral commitment through four stages: initial legal-orientation mapping, legal-dilemma circles, role-reversal simulation and reflection, and the development of preventive actions. Evaluation used a Legal Orientation Inventory on a four-point scale, a scenario-based decision-making rubric, and participant reflection analysis. The indicators included acceptance of the function of law, risk sensitivity, confidence in using institutions, and readiness for preventive action. The results showed that the average legal-orientation score increased from 2.52 to 3.50, representing an increase of 0.98 points. The average simulation decision-making score reached 3.50 out of 4, with five participants achieving good or very good categories. All participants developed preventive action pledges covering document protection, payment records, contract-change verification, confirmation through official channels, and personal-data protection. The findings indicate that strengthening legal awareness should focus on risk assessment and preventive behavior, rather than legal information alone.
Co-Authors Anto Anto Dwi Afni Maileni Evy Yusriani Irma Solvia Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti