Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Beyond Representation: Reconstructing Muslim Hero Identity through Procedural Rhetoric in Islamic Video Games Yuana Ryan Tresna; Hendri Waluyo Lensa; Dody S. Truna; Rifki Rosyad
MSJ : Majority Science Journal Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): MSJ - August
Publisher : PT. Hafasy Dwi Nawasena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61942/msj.v4i3.642

Abstract

The representation of Muslims in digital games has received increasing scholarly attention, yet existing research has largely focused on visual imagery, narrative representation, and ideological discourse while overlooking the procedural nature of gameplay. This article argues that Muslim hero identity in Islamic video games cannot be adequately understood through representational analysis alone. Instead, identity emerges through players' interaction with computational systems that organize ethical choices, moral responsibility, and religious meaning. This study aims to reconstruct the concept of Muslim hero identity by integrating Representation Theory, Procedural Rhetoric, and Digital Religion into a unified conceptual framework. Employing a qualitative theory-building approach, the study combines systematic literature review, qualitative content analysis, critical discourse analysis, and theory synthesis to examine how identity is constituted through interactive gameplay rather than static representation. The analysis demonstrates that procedural mechanics, player agency, moral agency, and religious meaning-making collectively shape the construction of Muslim hero identity. Based on these findings, the study proposes the Procedural Muslim Hero Identity Framework (PMHIF), comprising five interconnected dimensions: Representational Foundation, Procedural System, Interactive Moral Agency, Religious Meaning-Making, and Procedural Muslim Hero Identity. The framework reconceptualizes Muslim hero identity as an emergent, participatory, and ethically situated process enacted through gameplay rather than merely represented through narrative or visual symbols. By moving beyond representational paradigms, this study extends Procedural Rhetoric into the domain of Digital Religion and offers a new interdisciplinary framework that contributes to Game Studies, Islamic Media Studies, and the broader scholarship on religion and interactive digital media.
Reconstructing the Epistemology of Istidrāk al-Ṣaḥābī as a Model of Ḥadīth Matn Criticism: An Analysis of al-Zarkashī’s al-Ijābah Yuana Ryan Tresna; Moh. Najib; Engkos Kosasih; Hendri Waluyo Lensa
MSJ : Majority Science Journal Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): MSJ - August
Publisher : PT. Hafasy Dwi Nawasena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61942/msj.v4i3.643

Abstract

Research on ḥadīth criticism has so far concentrated mainly on the authentication of the chain of transmission (isnād), while criticism of the text itself (matn) has not received proportionate scholarly attention. Yet the practice of evaluating the substance of ḥadīth can be traced back to the generation of the Companions through istidrāk al-ṣaḥābī, most notably as practiced by Sayyidah ʿĀʾishah. This study aims to reconstruct the theory of istidrāk al-ṣaḥābī as an epistemological model of ḥadīth matn criticism based on an analysis of al-Zarkashī’s al-Ijābah li-Īrād Mā Istadrakathu ʿĀʾishah ʿalā al-Ṣaḥābah. The study employs a qualitative approach in the form of library research and applies Theory-Building Research as its data-analysis technique. The primary data the text of al-Ijābah were analyzed through the stages of identifying cases of istidrāk, abstracting concepts, classifying critical instruments, and reconstructing theory. The findings show that istidrāk al-ṣaḥābī is a practice of matn criticism possessing a systematic methodological structure. Sayyidah ʿĀʾishah drew on a range of epistemic sources the Qur’an, the Sunnah, historical fact, empirical experience, linguistic analysis, and rational consideration as the basis for evaluating the substance of ḥadīth. On the basis of these findings, the study reconstructs the theory of istidrāk al-ṣaḥābī into three principal components: epistemic sources, critical instruments, and the mechanism of matn validation. This reconstruction demonstrates that matn criticism has been an integral part of ḥadīth methodology since the period of the Companions and broadens the understanding of the epistemology of classical ḥadīth criticism. The study offers a new conceptual model that enriches the development of theory in ḥadīth matn criticism and contributes to contemporary studies of ḥadīth epistemology.