Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Konstitusi: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Kannadhir Izzi
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kota Pasuruan Nomor 127/Pid.B/2012/Pn.Psr Terkait Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Kannadhir Izzi; Kristina Sulatri; Humiati Humiati
Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Juli : Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konstitusi.v3i3.1968

Abstract

The transfer of a fiduciary collateral object without the fiduciary recipient’s written consent may harm the creditor and create legal liability for the debtor. This study analyzes the legal consequences of transferring fiduciary collateral without creditor approval and evaluates the judicial reasoning in Pasuruan District Court Decision Number 127/Pid.B/2012/PN.PSR. It employs normative legal research using statutory and case approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were collected through a literature review and qualitatively analyzed through deductive reasoning. The findings demonstrate that an unauthorized transfer creates civil liability in the form of breach of contract and criminal liability under Article 36 in conjunction with Article 23(2) of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security. The court’s reasoning in finding the defendant guilty was consistent with the established facts and mutually supporting evidence. Nevertheless, returning the vehicle to the defendant without expressly confirming the continuing fiduciary encumbrance creates legal uncertainty for the creditor. The return of evidence should not be interpreted as extinguishing the registered fiduciary right while the secured debt remains unpaid or the fiduciary recipient has not released its right.
Co-Authors Humiati Humiati Kristina Sulatri