Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Ratih Pandan Sari
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Hukum Pelayanan Publik Indonesia dan Malaysia dalam Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Ratih Pandan Sari; Fahrunnisa Fahrunnisa; Muhammad Ihsan Hanifa; Teguh Widodo; Harisnor Harisnor; Indah Dewi Megasari
Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Agustus : Majelis : Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/majelis.v3i3.1860

Abstract

Public service constitutes one of the principal indicators in achieving good governance. The state bears a constitutional obligation to guarantee citizens' rights to accessible, transparent, accountable, effective, and high-quality public services. Indonesia and Malaysia, as neighboring Southeast Asian countries with legal systems influenced by both common law and civil law traditions, demonstrate different approaches to regulating and implementing public service governance. This study aims to examine the similarities and differences between Indonesian and Malaysian public service regulations, evaluate their implementation, and formulate recommendations for strengthening Indonesia's public service system. The research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches. Legal materials consist of legislation, legal doctrines, scholarly publications, and previous studies, which are analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that Indonesia has a comprehensive legal framework but continues to face challenges related to bureaucratic complexity, regional disparities in service quality, fragmented digital governance, and limited performance evaluation. In contrast, Malaysia has established a more integrated administrative framework through digital government services, streamlined procedures, strong institutional coordination, and performance-based management. The study concludes that Indonesia should strengthen public service reform through integrated digital transformation, regulatory simplification, institutional coordination, civil servant capacity building, and performance-oriented evaluation while adopting relevant best practices from Malaysia.
Etika sebagai Fondasi Integritas Penyelenggara Pemilu dalam Mewujudkan Demokrasi yang Berkepercayaan Ratih Pandan Sari
Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Agustus : Majelis : Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/majelis.v3i3.1861

Abstract

A democratic election is determined not only by the quality of its legal framework and electoral administration but also by the integrity and ethical conduct of election organizers as the executors of the people's sovereignty. This study aims to analyze the role of ethics as the foundation of the integrity of election administrators in promoting a trustworthy democratic system and to examine the effectiveness of the role of the Honorary Council of Election Organizers (Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu/DKPP) in enforcing the code of ethics for election administrators in Indonesia. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and library approaches through the analysis of Law Number 7 of 2017, DKPP Regulation Number 2 of 2017, DKPP decisions, and relevant literature on ethics, integrity, and law enforcement. The findings indicate that ethics serves as the moral foundation guiding the conduct of election administrators, while integrity represents the practical implementation of ethical values in carrying out their duties, authority, and responsibilities. DKPP functions as a quasi-judicial institution authorized to examine, adjudicate, and impose sanctions for violations of the code of ethics in order to uphold the honor, independence, and professionalism of election administrators. Although the existing regulatory framework is relatively comprehensive, ethical violations continue to occur. Therefore, strengthening ethical awareness, internal supervision, professional capacity, and consistent enforcement of sanctions is essential to enhance public trust and to realize a high-quality democratic electoral system in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Fahrunnisa Fahrunnisa Harisnor Harisnor Indah Dewi Megasari Muhammad Ihsan Hanifa Teguh Widodo