J. Jamari
Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

FINITE ELEMENT STUDY ON ANGULATED ABUTMENTS IN MAXILLARY POSTERIOR DENTAL IMPLANTS Fadhil Putra Ramadhan; Kriswanto; Kaleb Priyanto; Rahmat Doni Widodo; J. Jamari; Athanasius Priharyoto Bayuseno
Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin Vol. 26 No. 01 (2026): June 2026 "Special issues for finite element analysis"
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jptm.v26i01.29582

Abstract

Dental implants in the posterior maxilla often require angulated abutments due to anatomical limitations. However, increased abutment angulation may influence stress distribution and compromise mechanical integrity. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of implant components with 15°, 17°, and 20° abutment angulations using three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA). A static vertical load of 276 N was applied to a D4-type bone block model. Results showed that higher abutment angles led to increased von Mises stress and strain, particularly on the abutment U-profile and the screw head. Despite the rising stress, all configurations maintained safety factors above 1.5. These findings indicate that angled abutments up to 20° are mechanically safe under axial loading conditions, supporting their use in clinically challenging posterior maxillary regions.
FIXTURE DIAMETER INFLUENCE ON BIOMECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF DENTAL IMPLANT ABUTMENT AND SCREW: A 3D FEA STUDY Rachael Andika; Kriswanto; Khoirul Huda; Rahmat Doni Widodo; J. Jamari; Athanasius Priharyoto Bayuseno
Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin Vol. 26 No. 01 (2026): June 2026 "Special issues for finite element analysis"
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jptm.v26i01.29583

Abstract

Dental implant stability hinges on fixture design, particularly diameter, influencing biomechanical performance. This study evaluates the impact of fixture diameter on von Mises stress, strain, and factor of safety in the abutment and screw of posterior dental implants using finite element analysis. A three-dimensional model of a mandibular first molar implant was developed with fixture diameters of 3.75, 4.0, and 5.0 millimeters, using Ti-6Al-4V and static loading simulating maximum voluntary clenching (177.38 N). Results show that the 5.0-millimeter diameter with a wider abutment reduces stress by 23.7 percent in the abutment and 33.9 percent in the screw, strain by 23.7 and 33.1 percent, respectively, and improves factor of safety, compared to 3.75 millimeters. The 5.0-millimeter diameter optimizes biomechanical stability, enhancing long-term implant success in posterior mandibular applications.
Biomechanical Evaluation of Implant Angulation on the First Mandibular Premolar: A 3D Finite Element Study Andrean Rachman Rizaldy; Kriswanto; Septian Eko Cahyanto; Rahmat Doni Widodo; J. Jamari; Athanasius Priharyoto Bayuseno
Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin Vol. 26 No. 01 (2026): June 2026 "Special issues for finite element analysis"
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jptm.v26i01.29780

Abstract

The design and orientation of dental implant connections play a critical role in biomechanical success, particularly in the posterior mandibular region, which is subjected to high occlusal loads. This study aims to evaluate the effect of varying abutment angulations (0°, 15°, and 25°) on stress distribution, strain, and safety factor in a reverse-buttress implant system using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) approach. A 3D implant model was simulated within an idealized bone block using ANSYS software, applying a physiological static load of 240 N. The results showed that increasing abutment angulation significantly elevated both maximum stress and strain, particularly in the screw component, which experienced a peak stress of 455.89 MPa at 15°. The safety factor, calculated based on the yield strength of titanium grade 5 (880 MPa), decreased from 14.18 (0° abutment) to 2.94 (25° abutment). Although all configurations remained within safe limits (>1.5), the axial (0°) configuration demonstrated the most stable load distribution and the highest safety margin. This study underscores the importance of considering abutment angulation in implant planning and supports the use of safety factor–based FEA as a predictive tool for assessing implant structural safety.