Afra Aprilliana
Universitas Syiah Kuala

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Law and Age of Enlightenment: Revolution in Thought and Politics, and European Thinkers M. Aziz; Salsabila; Apriana Ika Safitri; Afra Aprilliana; Nurasiah
Journal of Contextual Legal Studies and Economics Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): February, Legal Public and Public Community
Publisher : CV. Scholar Edukasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66052/xbvh8823

Abstract

In the early middle ages, after the fall of the western roman empire, there was a blending of two major legal systems that influenced the development of law in europe: roman law and germanic law. Although these two legal systems were fundamentally different, they interacted and adapted under the influence of the barbarian kingdoms, particularly within the frankish kingdom. This article examines the comparison between roman law, based on written principles, and germanic law, which was more customary and oral, and how both were applied and synthesized under the rule of charlemagne. By analyzing the influence and implementation of these two legal systems, this study shows that while roman lawwas more structured and systematic, germanic law played an important role in maintaining social balance through community-based dispute resolution mechanisms. Through charlemagne’s efforts to codify laws in the capitularies, which incorporated elements from both legal systems, a legal synthesis was created that influenced the formation of modern legal systems in europe, including the civil law tradition. This research aims to provide insight into how these two different legal traditions interacted and contributed to the development of a more organized legal structure in the frankish kingdom, as well as their long-term impact on European.
The Historical Dynamics and Evolution of Islamic Educational Thought from the Classical to the Modern Era: Implications for Contemporary Education Asyva Dwi Angina; Wany Rezky; Afra Aprilliana
Indonesian Journal of Educational Sciences and Research Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): July, Advances in Teaching, Learning, and Educational Research
Publisher : CV. Scholar Edukasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66052/xaeekd15

Abstract

This article aims to explain the historical dynamics and evolution of Islamic thought from the classical to the modern phase, as well as show how the old intellectual heritage still works in today's Islamic reading. The method in this article is a literature review with a descriptive-critical approach to Indonesian journal articles in the last five years that discuss contemporary interpretation, modern Sufism, Islamic education reform, Ibn Khaldun's pragmatism, Nurcholish Madjid's secularization, and Gus Dur's post-secularism. The brief results of the study show, first, Islamic thought moved from a classical orientation that emphasized harmony between Sufism, fiqh, and morals to modernization that emphasized ijtihad, rationality, and educational reform. Second, contemporary thought expands the horizon to issues of gender, democracy, moderation, and religion-state relations. The novelty of this article is to read the evolution of Islamic thought as a continuation of the dialogue between tradition and renewal, not as a break from history.