Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Climate Justice Review Indonesian Court and Justice Review
Auliya Rochman
Universitas Mulawarman

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
New Capital, New Threats? Climate Justice Perspectives on Indonesia’s Capital Relocation Auliya Rochman; Maulana Prasetyo; Fitria Damayanti
Indonesian Climate Justice Review Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): October, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/h78yrk75

Abstract

This paper critically examines the climate justice implications of Indonesia’s decision to relocate its capital from Jakarta to East Kalimantan, exploring the potential risks and benefits through the lens of climate vulnerability and environmental justice. Jakarta has long been grappling with climate-related challenges such as flooding, land subsidence, and rising sea levels, prompting the government to propose a new capital that would be more resilient to climate impacts. However, this relocation raises significant concerns about the environmental and social consequences for the new region, particularly with regard to land use, biodiversity loss, and the displacement of local communities. Using a climate justice framework, this study assesses the equitable distribution of both the benefits and burdens of the capital relocation, questioning whether the needs of vulnerable populations—such as indigenous peoples and rural communities—are adequately addressed. Through policy analysis, interviews with stakeholders, and an exploration of local environmental challenges, the paper explores how the relocation plan may inadvertently exacerbate socio-environmental inequalities. Findings suggest that while the new capital may alleviate some climate pressures in Jakarta, it also presents new threats to the indigenous communities and ecosystems in East Kalimantan, raising concerns about the sustainability and fairness of the relocation. The paper calls for a more inclusive and climate-resilient approach to urban planning that considers long-term environmental impacts and prioritizes the rights of marginalized communities in both Jakarta and East Kalimantan.
The New Face of Corruption Trials in Indonesia: Political Influence, Public Perception, and Judicial Accountability Ridwan Arifin; Auliya Rochman; Ayon Diniyanto; Rizki Sulthoni
Indonesian Court and Justice Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): May, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/31njav88

Abstract

Corruption trials in Indonesia have long been viewed as both a test and a symbol of judicial integrity. In recent years, however, shifts in political dynamics and public sentiment have reshaped the way corruption cases are prosecuted and adjudicated. This study investigates the changing nature of corruption trials in Indonesia by examining recent high-profile cases, the role of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), and the judiciary’s response under increased political scrutiny. Using case study analysis, media reviews, and legal documentation, the research explores how political influence and public pressure affect prosecutorial discretion, judicial decisions, and institutional accountability. The findings reveal a growing concern over selective enforcement, perceived leniency toward political elites, and the weakening of anti-corruption institutions. Public trust in judicial outcomes is increasingly contingent on transparency and the appearance of impartiality, yet courts often struggle to maintain credibility in politically charged contexts. The novelty of this study lies in its integrated analysis of legal processes, political pressure, and societal expectations. It argues that restoring public confidence in corruption trials requires not only institutional reform but also judicial courage and systemic insulation from partisan influence. The study contributes to comparative discussions on judicial accountability in transitional democracies.
Co-Authors Ayon Diniyanto Fitria Damayanti Maulana Prasetyo Ridwan Arifin Rizki Sulthoni