Auliya Rochman
Universitas Mulawarman

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

New Capital, New Threats? Climate Justice Perspectives on Indonesia’s Capital Relocation Auliya Rochman; Maulana Prasetyo; Fitria Damayanti
Indonesian Climate Justice Review Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): October, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/h78yrk75

Abstract

This paper critically examines the climate justice implications of Indonesia’s decision to relocate its capital from Jakarta to East Kalimantan, exploring the potential risks and benefits through the lens of climate vulnerability and environmental justice. Jakarta has long been grappling with climate-related challenges such as flooding, land subsidence, and rising sea levels, prompting the government to propose a new capital that would be more resilient to climate impacts. However, this relocation raises significant concerns about the environmental and social consequences for the new region, particularly with regard to land use, biodiversity loss, and the displacement of local communities. Using a climate justice framework, this study assesses the equitable distribution of both the benefits and burdens of the capital relocation, questioning whether the needs of vulnerable populations—such as indigenous peoples and rural communities—are adequately addressed. Through policy analysis, interviews with stakeholders, and an exploration of local environmental challenges, the paper explores how the relocation plan may inadvertently exacerbate socio-environmental inequalities. Findings suggest that while the new capital may alleviate some climate pressures in Jakarta, it also presents new threats to the indigenous communities and ecosystems in East Kalimantan, raising concerns about the sustainability and fairness of the relocation. The paper calls for a more inclusive and climate-resilient approach to urban planning that considers long-term environmental impacts and prioritizes the rights of marginalized communities in both Jakarta and East Kalimantan.
The New Face of Corruption Trials in Indonesia: Political Influence, Public Perception, and Judicial Accountability Ridwan Arifin; Auliya Rochman; Ayon Diniyanto; Rizki Sulthoni
Indonesian Court and Justice Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): May, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/31njav88

Abstract

Corruption trials in Indonesia have long been viewed as both a test and a symbol of judicial integrity. In recent years, however, shifts in political dynamics and public sentiment have reshaped the way corruption cases are prosecuted and adjudicated. This study investigates the changing nature of corruption trials in Indonesia by examining recent high-profile cases, the role of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), and the judiciary’s response under increased political scrutiny. Using case study analysis, media reviews, and legal documentation, the research explores how political influence and public pressure affect prosecutorial discretion, judicial decisions, and institutional accountability. The findings reveal a growing concern over selective enforcement, perceived leniency toward political elites, and the weakening of anti-corruption institutions. Public trust in judicial outcomes is increasingly contingent on transparency and the appearance of impartiality, yet courts often struggle to maintain credibility in politically charged contexts. The novelty of this study lies in its integrated analysis of legal processes, political pressure, and societal expectations. It argues that restoring public confidence in corruption trials requires not only institutional reform but also judicial courage and systemic insulation from partisan influence. The study contributes to comparative discussions on judicial accountability in transitional democracies.
The Legal Struggles of the Madurese in Kalimantan: A Case Study of Ethnic Conflict and Discrimination in Indonesian Courts Auliya Rochman
Indonesian Minority Justice Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/wd4c4w67

Abstract

This paper investigates the legal struggles faced by the Madurese ethnic group in Kalimantan, focusing on both historical and contemporary legal discrimination that exacerbates ethnic tensions and impedes social justice. The Madurese, who have historically been marginalized in the region, have faced discriminatory legal practices that have perpetuated their social exclusion. The study examines how legal frameworks, such as the 1965 Anti-Communist Law, have historically been used to target the Madurese, especially during periods of political unrest, including the 1996 Sampit conflict. The paper also explores how contemporary legal issues—ranging from land ownership disputes to labor rights—continue to disadvantage the Madurese in Kalimantan, where they often face unequal treatment in the courts. Through an analysis of legal cases, interviews with community members, and examination of regional policies, the paper highlights how ethnic bias in the judicial system has hindered the ability of the Madurese to secure justice. The study underscores the need for judicial reforms aimed at combating ethnic bias, ensuring equal access to legal protections, and promoting social cohesion. The paper concludes by proposing specific measures for addressing ethnic discrimination within the legal system and ensuring that the Madurese and other marginalized groups have equal rights under the law.
Legal Assistance and Citizenship Documentation for Stateless Persons: A Case Study in Border Areas of West Kalimantan: Bantuan Hukum dan Dokumentasi Kewarganegaraan bagi Orang Tanpa Kewarganegaraan: Studi Kasus di Daerah Perbatasan Kalimantan Barat Auliya Rochman; Ridwan Arifin
Lentera Masyarakat Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): July, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/r8673940

Abstract

Introduction:Statelessness constitutes a persistent legal and social problem in Indonesia’s border areas, particularly in West Kalimantan, where historical migration, porous borders, and administrative exclusion intersect. Stateless individuals often lack birth certificates and identity documents, rendering them invisible to the state and excluded from basic rights. Purposes:This study investigates the role of legal assistance in facilitating access to citizenship documentation and legal recognition for stateless persons living in border communities. Method:A qualitative case study methodology was employed, involving in-depth interviews with stateless individuals, legal aid practitioners, civil registry officials, and local leaders. Policy and legal framework analysis was conducted to examine nationality laws and administrative procedures. Findings and Results:The research demonstrates that legal assistance substantially improved access to civil registration by guiding applicants through complex administrative requirements and advocating before authorities. Legal aid organizations functioned as intermediaries that bridged trust gaps between marginalized communities and state institutions. Nevertheless, geographical isolation, limited state capacity, and rigid bureaucratic practices continued to hinder comprehensive resolution of statelessness. UrgencyResolving statelessness is urgent as legal invisibility perpetuates intergenerational poverty and social exclusion. Contribution:This study enriches empirical knowledge on legal interventions addressing statelessness in border regions. Recommendation:The study recommends administrative reform, mobile registration services, and strengthened cross-border coordination.
Human Rights and Environmental Justice: The Struggle for Indigenous Rights Against Environmental Degradation in Indonesia Auliya Rochman; Ekapala Suryana; Ethan Michael Robertson
Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Human Rights Law and Policy Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): July, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/403fwg65

Abstract

Indonesia's indigenous communities face significant human rights challenges due to environmental degradation, including deforestation, mining, and the effects of climate change. This paper explores the intersection of human rights and environmental justice, focusing on the rights of indigenous peoples to land, resources, and cultural survival. Through case studies of indigenous resistance movements, the paper investigates the legal, social, and political obstacles these communities face in protecting their lands from large-scale industrial activities. It also examines the role of environmental organizations and advocacy groups in supporting indigenous rights and seeking legal redress. The findings suggest that while some progress has been made in recognizing indigenous land rights, significant legal and institutional barriers remain. The research emphasizes the importance of integrating indigenous knowledge and legal perspectives into national environmental policies and provides a framework for advancing environmental justice in Indonesia. This paper offers an in-depth exploration of the intersection between human rights and environmental justice for indigenous communities in Indonesia, providing a comprehensive analysis of the legal and social challenges they face. The study contributes to environmental justice literature by highlighting the unique struggles of indigenous communities in Indonesia and advocating for legal reforms that recognize and protect their rights in the context of environmental degradation.