Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Stakeholder Analysis Waste Management in Tanjungpinang City Hutahaean, Permata Pebester Natalia; Simangunsong, Damayanti; Mardiyanti, Elisa; Okta, Auliana; Lestari, Indah Puji
Journal Governance Bureaucratic Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : Center for Maritime Policy Governance Studies (CMPGS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31629/jgbr.v1i1.7139

Abstract

Solid waste management in urban areas has become a pressing environmental and governance issue, particularly in rapidly developing secondary cities such as Tanjungpinang, Indonesia. Despite the existence of regulatory frameworks like Regional Regulation No. 3 of 2015, the city's waste management system remains underdeveloped, marked by inefficient collection services, inadequate infrastructure, and limited public participation. This study aims to examine the stakeholder landscape in Tanjungpinang’s waste governance to identify institutional gaps, coordination challenges, and opportunities for improved collaboration. The research employs a qualitative and interpretive methodology, combining document analysis and stakeholder mapping using Eskerod & Jepsen’s influence-interest matrix and the Friedman and Miles stakeholder salience framework. Findings indicate that the Department of Environment (DLH) holds the highest level of authority but often lacks the urgency and resources needed for effective intervention. Meanwhile, actors with high urgency, such as informal waste workers and local communities, lack legitimacy and power, leading to their exclusion from formal governance processes. The stakeholder network is characterized by low mutuality and fragmented relationships, particularly between state and non-state actors. Waste banks and NGOs operate with limited support despite their significant roles in community outreach and recycling initiatives. The study concludes that sustainable urban waste management in Tanjungpinang requires inclusive governance reforms that build institutional capacity, strengthen stakeholder interdependence, and integrate informal actors into formal waste systems. These findings offer practical insights for enhancing stakeholder engagement and aligning local waste policies with Sustainable Development Goal 11 on sustainable cities and communities.
Pengaruh Rasionalitas Terbatas terhadap Pengambilan Keputusan Desiana, Elisabet; Kasmita, Fera; Simangunsong, Damayanti; Bela, Roberta; Siahaan, Tripani Sartika Joya; Tumanggor, Ignasia Santa Lovian Br
Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Sosial Politik Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Oktober - Desember
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/jiksp.v3i2.3924

Abstract

This study aims to explain the influence of bounded rationality on decision-making processes, both at the individual and organizational levels. This concept was introduced by Herbert A. Simon (1957) as a critique of the classical assumption that humans are always rational in choosing the best alternative. Using a descriptive qualitative approach and a literature review method, this study analyzes various relevant literature and research findings to illustrate the relationship between bounded rationality and the decision-making process. The analysis shows that limited rationality does not always have a negative impact. In the context of public policy, such as the implementation of large-scale social restrictions (PSBB) during the COVID-19 pandemic, these limitations actually encourage decision-makers to act quickly and adaptively. However, on the other hand, bounded rationality can also pose a risk of bias, policy inconsistency, and bureaucratic inefficiency if not balanced with adequate data and technology support. Therefore, the application of digitalization and artificial intelligence (AI) is an important effort to mitigate the negative impacts of bounded rationality and strengthen the public decision-making process to be more efficient, participatory, and evidence-based