Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

ACCOUNTING INFORMATION QUALITY AND CORPORATE AUDIT EFFECTIVENESS: A RISK-BASED ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK FOR DIGITAL ENTERPRISES Finny Redjeki; Fitriana
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 3 No. 9 (2026): Jesocin : September
Publisher : Organisasi Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Digital accounting systems increase the volume and speed of records but do not automatically improve reliability. Automated processing can reproduce configuration errors at scale, obscure accountability, and create evidence that is abundant yet poorly governed.Aims: This article develops a risk-based assurance framework linking accounting information quality, internal control, audit evidence, technology-enabled procedures, professional judgment, and governance oversight.Research Method: The study uses an integrative conceptual review. Peer-reviewed literature, professional standards, and official institutional sources are synthesized through construct clarification, mechanism mapping, governance analysis, and development of propositions. The article does not report fabricated respondents, database counts, or statistical estimates.Results and Conclusion: The synthesis indicates that organizational value arises when information, decisions, controls, and performance measures operate as an integrated management system. Technology or functional activity alone is insufficient. Clear accountability, reliable data, balanced indicators, and periodic review are the principal enabling conditions.Contribution: The paper offers a practical capability framework and testable propositions that can guide organizational assessment and subsequent empirical research.
YEAR-END FINANCIAL CLOSE AND REPORTING QUALITY: A CAPABILITY FRAMEWORK FOR TIMELY AND TRACEABLE ASSURANCE Raden Roro Fatmasari; Finny Redjeki
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 2 No. 12 (2025): Jesocin : December
Publisher : Organisasi Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Organizations increasingly depend on year-end financial close, yet visible activity does not by itself demonstrate reliable capability or sustainable value. Fragmented responsibilities, weak evidence, and locally optimized metrics can cause decisions about reporting quality to create unmanaged exposure elsewhere. Aim: This article develops a governance framework that connects year-end financial close, reporting quality, and professional judgment through five mutually reinforcing capabilities: decision-useful information, control ownership, professional judgment, traceable evidence, and assurance and review. Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review. Established management research, professional standards, and institutional guidance are synthesized through construct clarification, mechanism mapping, risk-control analysis, and proposition development. It does not report respondents, sample statistics, or causal estimates. Results: The synthesis indicates that performance becomes more resilient when decision rights, data definitions, controls, escalation paths, and learning routines are designed as one management system. The proposed model links each capability to observable evidence and balanced indicators. Contribution: The article offers an auditable implementation sequence and propositions that can be tested in later empirical research.
DIGITAL BANKING ONBOARDING AND FINANCIAL INCLUSION: A CUSTOMER-CENTRIC GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK Farida Yulianty; Finny Redjeki
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Jesocin : February
Publisher : Organisasi Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Organizations increasingly depend on digital banking onboarding, yet visible activity does not by itself demonstrate reliable capability or sustainable value. Fragmented responsibilities, weak evidence, and locally optimized metrics can cause decisions about financial inclusion to create unmanaged exposure elsewhere. Aim: This article develops a governance framework that connects digital banking onboarding, financial inclusion, and fair value exchange through five mutually reinforcing capabilities: customer insight, service consistency, fair value exchange, responsive recovery, and trust and learning. Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review. Established management research, professional standards, and institutional guidance are synthesized through construct clarification, mechanism mapping, risk-control analysis, and proposition development. It does not report respondents, sample statistics, or causal estimates. Results: The synthesis indicates that performance becomes more resilient when decision rights, data definitions, controls, escalation paths, and learning routines are designed as one management system. The proposed model links each capability to observable evidence and balanced indicators. Contribution: The article offers an auditable implementation sequence and propositions that can be tested in later empirical research.
FINTECH PARTNERSHIP GOVERNANCE FOR BANK PEREKONOMIAN RAKYAT: BALANCING INNOVATION, CONTROL, AND CUSTOMER PROTECTION Faisal Matriadi; Finny Redjeki
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 3 No. 5 (2026): Jesocin : May
Publisher : Organisasi Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Organizations increasingly depend on fintech partnership governance, yet visible activity does not by itself demonstrate reliable capability or sustainable value. Fragmented responsibilities, weak evidence, and locally optimized metrics can cause decisions about bank perekonomian rakyat to create unmanaged exposure elsewhere. Aim: This article develops a governance framework that connects fintech partnership governance, bank perekonomian rakyat, and fair value exchange through five mutually reinforcing capabilities: customer insight, service consistency, fair value exchange, responsive recovery, and trust and learning. Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review. Established management research, professional standards, and institutional guidance are synthesized through construct clarification, mechanism mapping, risk-control analysis, and proposition development. It does not report respondents, sample statistics, or causal estimates. Results: The synthesis indicates that performance becomes more resilient when decision rights, data definitions, controls, escalation paths, and learning routines are designed as one management system. The proposed model links each capability to observable evidence and balanced indicators. Contribution: The article offers an auditable implementation sequence and propositions that can be tested in later empirical research.