Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences
Yuki Mulyani
Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Evaluation of Changes in Patient Data Protection Regulations and Legal Obligations of Radiologists in The Era of Health Service Digitalization Yuki Mulyani; Faisal Santiago
Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik (November 2025 - Januari 2026)
Publisher : Greenation Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jgsp.v3i4.558

Abstract

The digital transformation in the healthcare sector has transformed the way patient data is managed, including in radiology, which now relies on electronic systems such as the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). This change has created an urgent need for regulations capable of protecting medical data from potential leaks and misuse. This study aims to evaluate changes in patient data protection regulations and examine the legal obligations of radiologists in the era of digital healthcare services. The method used is normative juridical research with a statutory and conceptual approach, utilizing primary legal materials in the form of Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection and Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health, as well as secondary legal materials such as journals, books, and health law doctrine. The analysis shows that both laws have strengthened legal protection for patient data through stricter regulations regarding electronic medical records, data controller obligations, and sanctions for violations of personal data protection. However, the implementation of these regulations still faces technical and normative obstacles, including weak digital infrastructure, lack of legal literacy among medical personnel, and suboptimal inter-agency coordination. Radiologists' legal obligations now extend to the realm of digital ethics, including responsibility for the security of electronic patient data. Regulatory harmonization and strengthening of digital medical data protection policies are needed to ensure legal certainty and maintain public trust in digital healthcare services.
Malpractice Law Update on Radiologists' Liability in Cases of Diagnostic Errors and Standards of Practice Yuki Mulyani; Azis Budianto
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (September
Publisher : Greenation Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v3i3.631

Abstract

The development of modern medicine places radiology as a crucial pillar in the diagnostic process, but on the other hand, it opens up the potential for misdiagnosis with legal implications. Radiologists have a professional responsibility to establish accurate diagnoses based on medical practice standards. However, negligence or deviations can lead to malpractice issues. Legal reforms in Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health bring significant changes to the concept of responsibility for medical personnel, including radiologists, by more firmly regulating criminal, civil, administrative, and disciplinary liability mechanisms. Furthermore, technical regulations such as Minister of Health Regulation Number 24 of 2020 concerning Clinical Radiology Services, as well as regulations of the Indonesian Medical Council and the Nuclear Energy Regulatory Agency (BAPETEN) regarding radiation safety, provide a comprehensive normative foundation for professional standards and patient safety. This study uses a normative-juridical method with a statutory regulatory approach and analysis of jurisprudential cases to examine the extent to which legal reforms provide certainty and protection for both patients and medical personnel. The study's findings indicate that despite increasingly clear legal frameworks, there remains overlap in the application of criminal and administrative sanctions, as well as challenges in distinguishing inherent medical risks from criminally punishable negligence. Therefore, regulatory harmonization, strengthening of radiology practice standards, and a fair and balanced medical dispute resolution mechanism are needed.
Co-Authors Azis Budianto Faisal Santiago