Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Mathematics Learning Innovation (JMLI)
Sudarmono
Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia
Mathematics

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Evaluasi Program Pendidikan di Era Merdeka Belajar: Tinjauan Sistematis Model CIPP (Context, Input, Proses, Product) Andi Kamal Ahmad; Syaiful; Sitti Mania; Muhammad Nur Akbar Rasyid; Sudarmono
Journal of Mathematics Learning Innovation Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Mathematics Learning Innovation
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/jmlipare.v5i2.16935

Abstract

This study evaluates how STKIP DDI Pinrang managed the 7th Cohort of the Campus Teaching Program (KM7) to improve numeracy skills in four elementary schools using the Context Input Process Product (CIPP) model. This qualitative evaluative case study combined interviews, observations, questionnaires, official documents, assessment records, and eight digital artifacts. Research participants included one university coordinator, two field supervisors, seven students, four mentor teachers, and records for 166 students in grades 2–6. Context analysis identified uneven needs regarding curriculum resources, basic operations, digital access, and numerical reasoning. Inputs consisted of five central training sessions, one local session, two supervisor development sessions, and operational support for which financial details were not available. Process records documented eight sharing sessions, 25 external coordination contacts, and a review of all 36 required reports, resulting in 100% administrative completeness. Assessments of numeracy skills and digital artifacts have been documented; however, school-level post-test statistics, effect sizes, and rubric distributions are not available; therefore, educational improvements cannot be concluded. CIPP distinguishes between traceable governance achievements and outcome claims that require stronger evidence, and supports prospective indicators, school level reporting, and documented decision records.
Co-Authors Andi Kamal Ahmad Muhammad Nur Akbar Rasyid Sitti Mania, Sitti Syaiful