Setiyono Setiyono
Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Neuro-Protective Criminal Justice: A New Paradigm For Child Criminal Responsibility And Protection Vience Ratna Multiwijaya; Setiyono Setiyono; Rini Purwaningsih; Muhamad Adystia Sunggara; Arini Azka Muthia
LAW REFORM Vol 22, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v22i2.82196

Abstract

Contemporary criminal justice systems predominantly assess child criminal responsibility through fixed age thresholds and formal legal capacity while often disregarding neuroscientific evidence concerning brain development, impulse regulation, and limited decision making capacity. This article proposes neuro protective criminal justice that integrates neuroscience, neurolaw, and child centered human rights into criminal law policy. The study aims to examine the conceptual foundation of neuro protective criminal justice, analyze child criminal liability under Indonesian law, and develop a model of neurological protection within the child criminal justice system. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. The analysis demonstrates that age based responsibility doesn’t adequately reflect children’s vulnerability to social and structural influences. It argues for a framework that prioritizes rehabilitation, prevention of neurological and psychological harm, and long term developmental well being through restorative justice, therapeutic interventions, and diversion. This study positions neuro protection as a foundational principle of child criminal justice while providing normative guidance for legal reform consistent with neuroscientific knowledge and international child protection standards. The study concludes that Indonesia should introduce regulations requiring neurological development analysis throughout juvenile criminal proceedings and reform legal practices across all components of its legal system.
Addressing the Regulatory Gaps in Indonesian Financial Alternative Dispute Resolution Dinda Keumala; Setiyono Setiyono; Muhamad Ikhwan bin Mohd Zain
ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Vol. 19 No. 1 (2025): ADLIYA : Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/adliya.v19i1.44761

Abstract

This study examines the regulatory gaps in Indonesia’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution (LAPS SJK), established by the Indonesian Financial Services Authority (OJK) to resolve disputes between consumers and financial service providers. Using a normative method, the study identifies significant shortcomings in the legal framework governing LAPS SJK. Specifically, the founding of LAPS SJK did not explicitly reference the Law of OJK and its amendments. Moreover, the OJK regulation governing the institution fails to account for the Law on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions, leading to inconsistencies in the legal foundation. Additionally, the terminology used in OJK regulations diverges from the Law on the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector. This research highlights the need for a more coherent and comprehensive legal framework for financial services dispute resolution in Indonesia.