Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA BAGI PELAKU KEKERASAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP PEREMPUAN Vience Ratna Multiwijaya; Ermania Widjajanti; Rini Purwaningsih
Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (206.028 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/hpph.v4i2.14774

Abstract

Kekerasan seksual merupakan tindak pidana yang sering terjadi pada wanita dan anak dansudah menjadi permasalahan global. Banyaknya kekerasan terhadap perempuan ini telahmendorong negara untuk mensahkan Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang TindakPidana Kekerasan Seksual. Terjadinya kekerasan seksual dapat mengakibatkan korbanmengalami penderitaan fisik, mental, seksual, ekonomi serta sosial yang berkepanjangan. Olehkarenanya, isu yang diangkat adalah Bagaimana Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap PelakuKekerasan Seksual terhadap perempuan ? Penelitian ini merupakan tipe penelitian normatifdengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Data sekunder sebagai data utama, yangterdiri bahan hukum primer berupa peraturan perundangan-undangan yaitu Undang-UndangNo. 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual, Kitab Undang-Undang HukumPidana (KUHP), RUU-KUHP serta Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 2004 tentang PenghapusanKekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga dan bahan hukum sekunder yang berupa buku-buku sertajurnal dan artikel tentang kekerasan seksual terhadap perempuanSeluruh data dianalisis secarakualitatif. Kebijakan hukum pidana terhadap pelaku mengenai tindak pidana kekerasan seksualkhususnya pada perempuan sebenarnya sudah diatur dalam beberapa peraturan, seperti KUHP,RUU KUHP, UU No. 23 tahun 2004. Namun secara khusus pengaturan dalam ketentuan UUNo. 12 tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual.
Burden of Proof Reverse as A Solution to Eradicate Bribery in Criminal Acts of Corruption Dian Adriawan Daeng Tawang; Rini Purwaningsih
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 2 No. 9 (2022): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR)
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v2i9.160

Abstract

The assumption that corruption is seen as an extraordinary crime (extraordinaru crime) and transnational and cross-border crimes causes that in terms of eradicating it needs to be carried out in an extraordinary manner (extra ordinary counter measure). There is a stereotype in the community regarding gratification and bribery, it is difficult to prove it, so it is necessary to apply an exception (enforcement exceptionality) through the application of reversing the burden of proof which will make it difficult for the public prosecutor to escape from the snares of the law. The research’s purpose of implementing the method of reversing the burden of proof in addition to making it easier for public prosecutors to ensnare perpetrators of gratification and bribery is to minimize the occurrence of criminal acts of corruption. It is hoped that the results of this research will be able to contribute ideas and suggestions for the development of legal science, especially those related to criminal procedural law. It is also hoped that this research will become part of the library information media that provides benefits to sharpen the quality in making further research on formal criminal law. This normative research is supported by primary data, in addition to using secondary data which is a literature study in the form of laws and regulations. There is a stipulation of the method of reversing the burden of proof, shifting the burden of proof from the public prosecutor to the defendant.
Neuro-Protective Criminal Justice: A New Paradigm For Child Criminal Responsibility And Protection Vience Ratna Multiwijaya; Setiyono Setiyono; Rini Purwaningsih; Muhamad Adystia Sunggara; Arini Azka Muthia
LAW REFORM Vol 22, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v22i2.82196

Abstract

Contemporary criminal justice systems predominantly assess child criminal responsibility through fixed age thresholds and formal legal capacity while often disregarding neuroscientific evidence concerning brain development, impulse regulation, and limited decision making capacity. This article proposes neuro protective criminal justice that integrates neuroscience, neurolaw, and child centered human rights into criminal law policy. The study aims to examine the conceptual foundation of neuro protective criminal justice, analyze child criminal liability under Indonesian law, and develop a model of neurological protection within the child criminal justice system. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. The analysis demonstrates that age based responsibility doesn’t adequately reflect children’s vulnerability to social and structural influences. It argues for a framework that prioritizes rehabilitation, prevention of neurological and psychological harm, and long term developmental well being through restorative justice, therapeutic interventions, and diversion. This study positions neuro protection as a foundational principle of child criminal justice while providing normative guidance for legal reform consistent with neuroscientific knowledge and international child protection standards. The study concludes that Indonesia should introduce regulations requiring neurological development analysis throughout juvenile criminal proceedings and reform legal practices across all components of its legal system.