Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Characteristics of Eye Diseases at Merpati Eye Clinic Dr Kariadi Hospital Semarang in 2020-2022 Rahmi, Fifin Luthfia; Wildan, Arief; Maharani, Maharani; Prihatningtias, Riski; Nugroho, Trilaksana; Rikiandraswida, Zahira; Ryamizard, Rizal
Diponegoro International Medical Journal Vol 4, No 1 (2023): July 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/dimj.v4i1.17677

Abstract

Background: The COVID -19 pandemic that has occurred since 2020 has changed and affected all aspects of life. In health services, the pandemic has limited patients from coming to health facilities. Recording of ophthalmology cases in health facilities has an important role in providing information about eye health problems that often occur in the community to identify what are the main challenges faced in the field of eye care.Objective: This study aims to identify the characteristics of eye diseases at the Merpati Eye Polyclinic Dr Kariadi Hospital Semarang in 2020-2022.Methods: This study was a retrospective descriptive study. The clinical characteristic data (gender, age, diagnosis, and Clinic) are retrieved from the medical records of patients suffering from eye diseases who underwent treatment at the Merpati Eye Clinic, Dr. Kariadi Hospital Semarang and was diagnosed in 2020-2022. The data obtained were processed and analyzed using the google sheets program.Results: There were 2961 newly diagnosed patients with the 10 most diagnosed diseases are Refractive disorders (12,87%), Cataracts (11,21%), Glaucoma (10,40%), Diabetic Retinopathy (6,75%), Pseudophakia (5,30%), Papile Atrophy (5,10%), Retinal Vein Occlusion (4,22%), Corneal Ulcer (3,92%), Retinal Detachment (3,71%) and Uveitis (3,51%). Based on age category, the most patients were 51-60 years old (22,29%). Based on gender category, female gender (50,35%) is more than male (49,65%).Conclusion: Of all patients, the 10 most diagnosed diseases were Refractive Disorders, Cataracts, Glaucoma, Diabetic Retinopathy, Pseudophakia, Papillary Atrophy, Retinal Vein Occlusion, Corneal Ulcers, Retinal detachment and Uveitis.
Comparing Predictability of SRK/T, Barrett Universal II, and Kane Formulas on High Myopia Phacoemulsification Ryamizard, Rizal; Wisnu Sadasih; A. Rizal Fanany; Fatimah Dyah Nur Astuti
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 52 No 1 (2026): Ophthalmologica Indonesiana
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35749/oi.v52i1.102089

Abstract

Introduction: The refractive outcomes of phacoemulsification surgery have improved significantly in recent years, but it is still challenging to obtain good outcomes in eyes with long axial lengths. This study compares the difference between the predicted and manifest refraction outcomes between Sanders Retzlaff Kraff theoretical (SRK/T), Barrett Universal II (BU-II), and Kane formula in high myopia patients undergoing uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery. Methods: This cross-sectional design study includes eyes with high myopia (axial length ≥26.0 mm) that undergo uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery with intraocular lens implantation between January 2024 and January 2025 at Semarang Tertiary Hospital. The one-month post-surgery mean absolute prediction errors (MAE) difference between SRK/T, BU-II, and Kane formula are calculated and analyzed using the Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test. Result: Thirty-seven eyes meeting the criteria were analyzed, with a mean axial length of 29.07±2.42 mm. The MAE and percentages of eyes within 0.50 diopters (D) refractive prediction errors of the three formulas are as follows: SRK/T (0.68 D, 60%), BU-II (0.41 D, 73%), and Kane (0.37 D, 76%). There is a statistically significant difference in MAE between SRK/T vs BU-II (p < 0.05) and SRK/T vs Kane (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The Kane and BU-II formula has better accuracy in predicting refractive outcome (lower MAE and higher percentages of eyes within 0.5 D refractive prediction errors) than the SRK/T formula in patients with high myopia who undergo uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery.