Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : DE JURE

Kepemimpinan dan Nafkah Keluarga dalam Perspektif Nalar Tekstualis Ibn Hazm Al-Dzahiriy Salam, Nor
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 11, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (998.51 KB) | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v11i1.6574

Abstract

This study is motivated by the emergence of an assessment of the Dzahiriyah Islamic jurisprudence product, which on the one hand places the textual Dzahiriyah jurisprudence into the category of static jurisprudence, while on the different side it clearly shows the progress of the Dzahiriyah jurisprudence product. Through a study of the book of al-Muhalla written by Ibn Hazm, one conclusion is obtained that the Dzahiriyah madrasah fiqh products have relevance to efforts to build male and female relations in partnership family law and not superior-inferior positions. This can be seen from Ibn Hazm's view of leadership and conditional living in the family. Men and women alike have the possibility of becoming providers and leaders.Kajian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh munculnya penilaian terhadap produk fiqih madzhab Dzahiriyah, yang di satu sisi menempatkan pola pikir tekstualis fiqih Dzahiriyah ke dalam kategori pemikiran fiqih yang statis, sementara pada sisi yang berbeda justru secara jelas menunjukkan progresifitas produk fiqih Dzahiriyah. Melalui kajian terhadap kitab al-Muhalla yang ditulis oleh Ibn Hazm, diperoleh satu kesimpulan bahwa produk fiqh madzhab Dzahiriyah memiliki relevansi terhadap upaya membangun hubungan laki-laki dan perempuan dalam hukum keluarga yang bersifat kemitraan dan bukan posisi superior-inferior. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari pandangan Ibn Hazm tentang kepemimpinan dan nafkah dalam keluarga yang bersifat kondisional. Laki-laki dan perempuan sama-sama memiliki kemungkinan menjadi pemberi nafkah dan pemimpin.
Interfaith Marriage from the Perspective of Rationality: Theocentrism in Islamic Law and Anthropocentrism in Human Rights Law Salam, Nor; Purnomo, Agus; Saifullah, Saifullah; Ahmad, Sirojuddin
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 16, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Shariah Faculty UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v16i1.23989

Abstract

This article stems from a theoretical debate concerning interfaith marriage as formulated within Islamic and human rights laws. While Islamic law tends to prohibit interfaith marriage, human rights instruments view it as an individual's right and freedom. Therefore, this research aims to scrutinise the argumentative basis of Islamic law and human rights law regarding interfaith marriage. To address this focal issue, this study employed a literature research model reliant on content analysis, bearing the result concluding that the disparity in formulations between Islamic law and human rights law regarding the legality of interfaith marriage is due to their differing argumentative bases: Islamic law is rooted in theocentrism, whereas human rights law is rooted in anthropocentrism. However, by examining the opinions of contemporary thinkers regarding maqashid sharia, there appears to be a paradigm shift in theocentrism of Islamic law so that in the context of interfaith marriage, both Islamic law and human rights can justify it as part of a person's human rights.