Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal WAJAH HUKUM
Wicaksono Putra Haryadi
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Barang Bukti yang Diajukan Jaksa Penuntut Umum Dipersidangan Wicaksono Putra Haryadi; Angga Saputra; Muhammad Taufiq
Wajah Hukum Vol 10, No 2 (2026): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v10i2.2182

Abstract

Physical evidence constitutes a crucial element in the criminal evidentiary process, serving to reinforce the judge's conviction when rendering a verdict. However, not all physical evidence submitted by the Public Prosecutor can serve as a basis for judicial consideration without first undergoing an assessment of its validity, relevance, and connection to other forms of evidence recognized by law. This study aims to analyze the grounds upon which judges evaluate physical evidence submitted by the Public Prosecutor during trial, the factors influencing such evaluations, and the legal implications of these considerations for criminal verdicts. The study employs a normative legal research method, utilizing both statutory and conceptual approaches through an analysis of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), relevant legislation, legal doctrine, and court rulings. The grounds for judicial assessment of physical evidence submitted by the Public Prosecutor are supported by the forms of evidence stipulated in Article 184 paragraph (1) of the KUHAP, namely: witness testimony, expert testimony, documentary evidence, indications and the defendant's testimony
Co-Authors Angga Saputra Muhammad Taufiq