Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JIMEK
Sri Putri Hutabarat
Universitas Alwashliyah Medan
Economics, Econometrics & Finance

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja dan Fasilitas Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai di Dinas Pertanian dan Ketahanan Pangan Provinsi Sumatera Utara Sri Putri Hutabarat; Siti Ummi Arfah Nasution; Porkas Sojuangon Lubis
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): November: Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan (JIMEK)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jimek.v6i3.13385

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effects of work discipline and work facilities, both partially and simultaneously, on employee performance at the Agriculture and Food Security Agency of North Sumatra Province. This study employs a quantitative approach. The population consists of 1,096 employees, with a sample of 92 respondents determined using Slovin’s formula. Data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed using validity tests, reliability tests, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression, t-tests, F-tests, and the coefficient of determination (R²) using SPSS version 26. The results indicate that work discipline has a positive and significant effect on employee performance, with a t-value of 5.477, exceeding the t-table value of 1.987, and a significance level of 0.000 < 0.05. Work facilities also have a positive and significant effect, with a t-value of 5.740, exceeding the t-table value of 1.987, and a significance level of 0.000 < 0.05. Simultaneously, work discipline and work facilities significantly affect employee performance, with an F-value of 307.167, exceeding the F-table value of 3.10, and a significance level of 0.000 < 0.05. The Adjusted R-Square value of 0.871 indicates that both variables explain 87.1% of the variation in employee performance, while the remaining 12.9% is explained by other factors outside this study.
Co-Authors Porkas Sojuangon Lubis Siti Ummi Arfah Nasution