Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Business, Law, and Education International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM)
Shinta Hadiyantina
Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
From Formal Recognition to Effective Access: Regulatory Gaps in the Driving Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Indonesia Ajeng Zatalini Alfiyah Hadi; Moh. Fadli; Shinta Hadiyantina
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v7i1.1457

Abstract

The right to drive for persons with disabilities is not merely an administrative entitlement attached to a driver’s license; it is a practical component of the right to mobility, independent living, and equal participation. Indonesia has formally recognized this right through the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), Law No. 8 of 2016 on Persons with Disabilities, and Law No. 22 of 2009 on Road Traffic and Transportation, including the recognition of Class D and D1 driving licenses. Nevertheless, formal recognition has not been matched by operational norms that enable the right to be exercised safely and equally. This article analyzes the regulatory gaps surrounding the driving rights of persons with disabilities in Indonesia through the lenses of Amartya Sen’s capability approach to justice and the doctrine of legal certainty. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative-supportive approaches, the study examines Indonesian legislation, implementing regulations, international human rights instruments, and relevant legal scholarship. The findings show that the central problem is not the absence of recognition but the incompleteness of implementation: Indonesia lacks comprehensive national standards for adaptive vehicles, disability-responsive driver’s license procedures, and inclusive road-safety mechanisms. These gaps produce legal uncertainty, procedural inequality, and capability deprivation by limiting the real freedom of persons with disabilities to drive independently, safely, and with dignity. The article argues that regulatory reform should shift from declaratory recognition toward enforceable technical standards, functional competence-based licensing, and disability-inclusive safety governance.
The Decentralization Dilemma: Navigating Challenges In Building The Nusantara Capital City Dandi Wijaya; Dhia Al Uyun; Shinta Hadiyantina
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 7 No 1 (2025): International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v7i1.442

Abstract

Sejalan dengan pemindahan ibu kota baru di wilayah Kalimantan Timur, dalam ketentuan pasal 4 Ayat (1) Huruf b UU IKN menyebutkan bahwa Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara sebagai lembaga setingkat kementerian yang menyelenggarakan Pemerintahan Daerah Khusus Ibu Kota Nusantara, dan Pasal 5 Ayat (4) UU IKN yang menyebutkan bahwa Kepala Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara merupakan kepala Pemerintah Daerah Khusus Ibu Kota Nusantara yang berkedudukan setingkat menteri, ditunjuk, diangkat, dan diberhentikan oleh Presiden setelah berkonsultasi dengan DPR.Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis dampak jangka panjang yang timbul dari model pemerintahan terpusat terhadap pelaksanaan sistem pemerintahan baru di Wilayah Ibu Kota Nusantara. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan Pendekatan Perundang-undangan dan Pendekatan Konseptual. Adapun hasil penelitian ini, dampak yang timbul akan berpengaruh pada politik lokal, demokrasi serta representasi masyarakat atas perwakilannya, dan yang paling mendasar adalah hak konstitusionalnya sebagai warga negara. Sudah dipastikan tidak ada representasi lokal pada sistem politik perwakilan seperti saat ini.Kata Kunci: Ibu Kota Nusantara, Desentralisasi, dan Sentralisasi. In line with the relocation of the new capital city in the East Kalimantan region, in the provisions of Article 4 Paragraph (1) Letter b of the IKN Law, it is stated that the Nusantara Capital City Authority as a ministerial-level institution that organizes the Special Regional Government of the Nusantara Capital City, and Article 5 Paragraph (4) of the IKN Law which states that the Head of the Nusantara Capital Authority is the head of the Nusantara Capital Special Regional Government with a ministerial position, appointed and dismissed by the President after consulting with the House of Representatives. The purpose of this study is to analyze the long-term impact of the centralized governance model on the implementation of the new governance system in the Nusantara Capital city region. This study uses a type of normative legal research using a Legislative Approach and a Conceptual Approach. As for the results of this study, the implications will affect local politics, democracy, community representation of their representatives, and the most basic is their constitutional rights as citizens. It is certain that there is no local representation in the representative political system like today.Key Words: Nusantara Capital City, Decentralization, and Centralization.
The Concept of Renewal Period of Right to Cultivate (HGU) In Indonesian Land Law Hamjah; Imam Koeswahyono; Shinta Hadiyantina
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 7 No 2 (2025): International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v7i2.515

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji perbedaan pengaturan jangka waktu pemberian Hak Guna Usaha (HGU) antara Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA) dan peraturan turunan dari UU Cipta Kerja, yaitu Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2021. Dalam UUPA, tidak terdapat ketentuan mengenai jangka waktu pembaruan HGU, hanya mengatur perpanjangan hak tanpa klausula pembaruan setelah masa berlaku berakhir. Sebaliknya, UU Cipta Kerja dan PP 18 Tahun 2021 memberikan pengaturan jangka waktu yang berbeda, tanpa merujuk pada UUPA dan tanpa kejelasan pelaksanaan aturan tersebut, sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum. Tujuan penelitian adalah menganalisis kebijakan penggunaan jangka waktu pembaruan HGU yang diberikan pemerintah. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan baru memberikan jangka waktu perpanjangan dan pembaruan HGU hingga 95 tahun. Kebijakan ini berpotensi mengabaikan prinsip fungsi sosial tanah dan lebih mengutamakan investasi jangka panjang dibandingkan redistribusi tanah untuk keadilan agraria. Kata Kunci: Hak Guna Usaha, Jangka Waktu, Kebijakan, Agraria, Investasi Abstract This study examines the differences in the regulation of land use rights (Hak Guna Usaha, HGU) renewal periods between the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) and the derivative regulation from the Job Creation Law, namely Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021. The UUPA does not regulate the renewal period for HGU, only the extension of rights without clauses on renewal after the expiration period. Conversely, the Job Creation Law and PP 18 of 2021 regulate the renewal period differently, without referencing UUPA and lacking clarity on implementation, thus creating legal uncertainty. The study aims to analyze government policy regarding the renewal period of HGU rights. The method used is normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results reveal that the new policy grants renewal and extension of HGU rights for up to 95 years. This policy potentially neglects the social function of land and tends to prioritize long-term investment interests over land redistribution for agrarian justice. Keywords: Hak Guna Usaha, Renewal Period, Policy, Agrarian, Investment
Co-Authors Ajeng Zatalini Alfiyah Hadi Dandi Wijaya Dhia Al-Uyun Hamjah Imam Koeswahyono Mohammad Fadli