Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.318
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Batulis Civil Law Review TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review AIWADTHU: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum Yuridika LUTUR Law Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan PATTIMURA Law Study Review SASI KANJOLI Business Law Review BAMETI Customary Law Review
Latupono, Barzah
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 32 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Responsibility of the Land Assessor for the Results of the Assessment in Land Procurement Ameliyani, Riza; Laturette, Adonia Ivonne; Latupono, Barzah
PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review Vol 6, No 1 (2026): MARCH
Publisher : Postgraduate Program in Law, Pattimura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/pamali.v6i1.2270

Abstract

Introduction: The process of assessing land acquisition for the public interest by the appraisal whose price is then deliberated and determined as the value of the amount of compensation, but there is a lack of transparency in determining the amount of compensation by the appraisal. Where appraisal is an independent institution.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this article is to review and analyze the form of land appraiser's accountability in assessing land values for public interest.Methods of the Research: This study uses normative legal research. As primary legal materials, namely the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Law Number 5 Number 1960 concerning the Basic Agrarian Law, Law Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest, Government Regulation Number 19 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest, Government Regulation Number 39 of 2023 concerning the Implementation of Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest.Results Main Findings of the Research: This study concludes that the legal force of the results of the public appraiser's assessment report in land acquisition for public interest is final, meaning that the government and/or agencies that require land owned by the community pay according to the assessment results and close the space for deliberation regarding the amount and quantity, limited to deliberation regarding the form of compensation (Article 31 paragraph 1 and Article 34 of Law Number 2 of 2012). Meanwhile, the responsibility of land appraisers in assessing land values that are not in accordance with the principles of land acquisition that can harm one party and cause disputes between the parties involved in it can be subject to administrative sanctions and/or criminal sanctions.
Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Pelaksanaan Perkawinan Secara Sepihak Bairatnissa, Zulvira Zalleh; Latupono, Barzah; Fataruba, Sabri
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 4 (2022): Volume 2 Nomor 4, Juni 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1099

Abstract

Introduction: Marriage must go through a legal process and be recognized by both the community and the state.Purposes of the Research:the purpose of compiling this writing for all people who study law in the civil field, especially those related to the factors causing annulment and legal consequences of unilateral annulment of marriageMethods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical, with a statutory and conceptual approach. The sources of legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The technique of gathering legal materials carried out in this study was library research, then it was analyzed qualitatively.Results  of the Research: The laws and regulations regarding marriage do not regulate at all the legal consequences related to the unilateral cancellation of marriage (marriage) after the proposal and engagement, so people are so easy to annul it unilaterally to the detriment of the other party.However, if referring to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court Number 3191 K/Pdt/1984 dated December 12, 1985, then the unilateral annulment of marriage (marriage) after the proposal and engagement is a violation of the norms of decency and propriety in society, and is an act against the law,where this jurisprudence is then used as the basis of legal consideration of the Supreme Court judge in Decision Number: 1644 K/Pdt/2020. Namely the decision on the unilateral annulment of marriage (marriage) after the proposal and engagement made by Agus Suyitno to his partner Sri Subur Lestari.
Co-Authors Adonia Ivone Laturette Akbar, Muhamad Haidir Akyuwen, Rory Jeff Alfons, Sartje Sarah Ameliyani, Riza Atbar, Rini Awaluddin, Syah Ayu, Laras Bairatnissa, Zulvira Zalleh Fadel Ramadhan, Fadel Fataruba, Sabri Ganggas, Fansiska Vivi Hakim, Jamil Hamid, Moh Ilias Bin Harudin, Harlinud Jantje Tjiptabudy Jantje Tjiptabudy Kuahaty, Sarah Selfina La Ode Angga Lambouw, Giovita Nathaza Prasedia Laturette, Adonia Ivonne Latusawaule, Jilly Sekale Mahrita Aprilya Lakburlawal, Mahrita Aprilya Matuankotta, Jenny Kristiana Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun Muhammad Irham Musaad, Faly Antary Mussad, Saini Nawardi, Hamdan Pesulima, Theresia Louize Picarima, Elsa Olivia Pieris, Flourensya Lyventriz Pietersz, Jemmy Jefry Radjawane, Pieter Ramadan, La Ode Alfachriy Ridla Renuat, Ahmad Yani Simanjuntak, Vera Waty Solarbesain, Fransiskus Xaverius Soulisa, Mohammad Ibrahim Sidik Sukur, Ahmaf Fuzail Sukur, Fatma Resdiana Tjoanda, Merry Tuankotta, Abdul Gani Uktolseja, Novyta