Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal HAM The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies Society
Wiratraman, Herlambang Perdana
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Dua Dekade Kebebasan Akademik di Indonesia: Tantangan di Tengah Menguatnya Otoritarianisme dalam Model Barunya Wiratraman, Herlambang Perdana; Prakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana
Jurnal HAM Vol 15, No 2 (2024): August Edition
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/ham.2024.15.143-158

Abstract

This research focuses on analyzing the debates and roles of the academic freedom movement in Indonesia’s authoritarian politics. Numbers of scholars argued on the democracy decline and its current situation of authoritarian turn (Mietzner 2016, 2020; Hadiz 2017; Wiratraman 2018; Waburton and Aspinal 2019; and Winters 2021). Authoritarianism governance in recent politics has been worsening situation of free expression, including academic freedom. Recently, one of attacks is connected to cyber-attacks, which has been targeting journalists, academics, activists or students who defend human rights and environment, indigenous leaders, anti-corruption activists, and women's groups. This article discusses first, how has academic freedom at campuses been shaped by Indonesia's the rise of authoritarian politics; and second how academic freedom has been influenced and easily attacked in the rise of digital authoritarianism. By using an interdisciplinary approach, this article argues that there is a strong relation between the threat of academic freedom and the strengthening of authoritarianism in Indonesia, especially by disciplining campuses through a more systematic bureaucratization. While at the same time, academic freedom has been affected by stronger control of authoritarianism regime by deplying cyber troops in digital spheres. Hence, this article also discusses how human rights instruments and its institutions could promote and defend academic freedom in general. 
MENINJAU KEMBALI HUKUM DAN KEADILAN SOSIAL DALAM TRANSFORMASI DIGITAL Wiratraman, Herlambang Perdana; Budi, Arifin Setyo
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 52, No 3 (2023): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.52.3.2023.280-291

Abstract

Transformasi digital menghadirkan peluang dan tantangan bagi hukum dan keadilan sosial diakibatkan revolusi digital yang mengganggu kerangka hukum lama dan konvensional, sehingga memerlukan peraturan baru guna mengatasi beragam permasalahan. Kajian ini menfokuskan pada perlunya memikirkan kembali paradigma, teori maupun pendekatan hukum dan keadilan yang selama ini diperdebatkan dan dikonsepkan dalam ranah hukum, peradilan dan kebijakan politiknya, dalam konteks muktahir dan menjadi landasan pengembangan pendidikan hukum dan praktek pengembangan hukum, terutama dengan perkembangan teknologi digital. Serta upaya menjawab, bagaimana proses pemaknaan hukum dan keadilan sosial bisa menjadi lebih relevan menawarkan dahaga pengetahuan atas ruang publik dalam konteks perkembangan teknologi digital. Artikel ini mengajak mengembangkan pemikiran kritis imajinatif atas persinggungan hukum dan keadilan sosial yang berbasis pada kebutuhan dan sekaligus realitas teknologi digital. 
Indonesia’s Press Freedom And Law at Twenty-Five: Achievements, Legal Changes And Continuing Challenges Wiratraman, Herlambang Perdana
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v13i2.1761

Abstract

Political transition in Indonesia after Soeharto’s regime has been deeply influenced by a decentralised model of governance, which affected to more serious attacks to the journalism. Despite the 1999 Press Law prohibits censorship, banning, and licence, including the dissolving of Department of Information, press freedom has been always disturbed. The extra-judicial killing, physical violence, criminalising against journalism, and other attacks through formal judicial process or other forms, included impunity system, have shown uneasy situation for journalist at field or members of the press to perform journalistic works. The political-economy contestation at the local level plays more important role, rather than the influence of situation and policies at national level. The challenge is the law enforcement to protect journalist at works has been easily deniable and disregarded due to the law system itself that does not give significance effect. The court has been used to collapse media, silencing opposition, retaliating, and terrorising journalism. While the current politics, digital technology shapes press freedom into new challenges, which are more complicated situation due to massive deception and its cyber troops. Hence, this article overviews how press freedom situation and its laws have been shaped at twenty-five years, and what would be possible situation in recent Prabowo’s militarized governance in journalism. By using contextual analysis and historical approach, this article argues on how press freedom in Indonesia has been guaranteed by the law at last twenty-five years, and how Prabowo’s militarized governance shapes press freedom.
The Collapse of Negara Hukum: How Indonesia’s Rule of Law has been Shaped by Embedded Oligarch Politics? Wiratraman, Herlambang Perdana
The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies Vol. 4, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article argues recent performance of the rule of law in the 25-years period after Soeharto’s authoritarian regime. Why has there been a weakening of civil liberties, while on the other hand the oligarchic power and authoritarianism strengthens the current Indonesia’s politics. This article examines the prevalence of arbitrary practices, not only in the fair procedural process of law enforcement, but also why it is so easy to pass anti-democratic laws that contradict the principles of the rule of law. By referring to three specific case studies: free expression, academic freedom and press freedom, this article found that politics in Indonesia have become increasingly cartelized, while at the same time, systemically featured embedded oligarch politics. This starts from cartelized party by designing oligarch-based election trapped into constitutional system. In current politics, Jokowi’s administration represents the re-consolidation and strengthening of ‘new model’ of authoritarianism, which has seriously affected the rule of law, human rights and constitutional democracy, including the fundamental right to freedom of expression. Therefore, unsurprisingly, his political legacies during the Prabowo era and Jokowi's son, Gibran, will work with the same pattern and strategy of exploiting oligarchic power relations in the legal system.
Analisis Relasional Hukum Negara dan Hukum Rakyat dalam Konflik Agraria Bongkoran, Kabupaten Banyuwangi, Jawa Timur, Indonesia Sholahudin, Umar; Siahaan, Hotman; Wiratraman, Herlambang Perdana
Society Vol 8 No 2 (2020): Society
Publisher : Laboratorium Rekayasa Sosial, Jurusan Sosiologi, FISIP Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/society.v8i2.195

Abstract

Apart from having a socio-economic dimension, agrarian conflicts in Bongkoran, Banyuwangi Regency, East Java Province, Indonesia, also have a legal dimension. There is a dualism of law that is conflictual in terms of land tenure and use claims. One party, the government, and corporations rely on legalistic-positivistic state laws, while local people rely on folk law, namely informal laws that have existed, lived, and developed in communal society for generations. This research focuses on how the sociological perspective of law analyzes the legal conflicts that occur in Bongkoran agrarian conflict, particularly between state law and folk law. This research used a qualitative method with a legal sociology perspective. The research subjects were farmers/people of Bongkoran, Community Legal Advisors (CLA), Government (Local Government, National Land Agency, and Police), and corporate elements (PT Wongsorejo). Informants were selected using a purposive sampling technique, based on certain considerations that can be recognized beforehand, namely recognizing and understanding the problem under this research. Data collection was conducted through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively by referring to the perspectives that have been presented. The results indicated that the resolution of agrarian conflicts in Bongkoran requires the implementation of laws that are more just for local communities. The implementation of the laws is not only based on rigid articles in the law, but it needs attention to the socio-cultural and historical context of the community. The dominance of state law over folk law in agrarian conflicts results in the practice of subjugation of state law to folk law, both persuasively and repressively. Therefore, to minimize the tension and conflict between state law and folk law in agrarian conflicts, it is necessary to have a new understanding of the relationship between the two laws. The existence and enforcement of folk law are used as a complementary element in normative aspects that have not been regulated in state law.
Co-Authors Budi, Arifin Setyo Hotman Siahaan, Hotman Prakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana Umar Sholahudin