Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Implementasi Uqubat Cambuk Terhadap Wanita Hamil (Penelitian di Wilayah Hukum Kejaksaan Negeri Banda Aceh dan Kejaksaan Aceh Besar) Savana, Dikha; Din, Mohd.; Bakar, Ali Abu
Musawa Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Vol. 18 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University & The Asia Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/musawa.2019.182.183-199

Abstract

Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat dan Qanun Aceh Nomor 7 Tahun 2013 tentang Hukum Acara Jinayat adalah hukum positif yang berlaku di Propinsi Aceh. Salah satu yang menarik dalam penelitian ini adalah pelaksanaan hukum uqubat, yaitu hukum cambuk bagi wanita hamil yang telah memiliki kekuatan hukum tetap. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dan menganalisa implementasi, menjelaskan kendala dan hambatan implementasi Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat, terhadap pelaku jarimah yang hamil. Dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif, penelitian menunjukan bahwa implementasi pelaksanaan ‘uqubat bagi wanita hamil tidak dapat dilaksanakan,karena beberapa hal, antara lain sesuai dengan ketentuan pada Pasal 26 Qanun Nomor 7 Tahun 2013 masa penahanan hanya 30 hari. Sementara itu belum ada aturan yang lebih khusus dalam hal pemeriksaan bahwa terdakwa terbukti hamil, berupa surat atau alat bukti petunjuk dari ahli (dokter) yang berupa USG, yang menjadi pertimbangan hakim dalam penundaan eksekusi cambuk tersebut. Untuk itu perlu adanya kajian yang lebih komprehensif terhadap pelaksanaan ‘uqubat cambuk khusunya aturan yang mengatur lebih lanjut tentang ‘uqubat cambuk bagi wanita yang sedang hamil dalam Qanun Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Jinayat.[Qanun ACEH Number 6 year 2014 about Jinayat and Qanun ACEH Law number 7 year 2013 about Jinayat event law is a positive law in Aceh province. One of the interesting thing in this study is the implementation of the law Uqubat, a law of whip for pregnant women who have had a fixed legal force. The purpose of this research is to know and analyze the implementation, explaining the constraints and obstacles to implement ACEH Qanun Number 6 year 2014 about Jinayat law, to the perpetrator of the pregnant jarimah. By using qualitative method, research indicates that implementation of ‘ Uqubat for pregnant women can not be implemented, because several things, among others , according to the provisions of article 26 Qanun number 7 year 2013, the detention period is only 30 days. Meanwhile, there is no specific rules in the case of the examination that the defendant proved to be pregnant, in the form of a letter or a means of evidence from USG, as the proof for the judge to consider the (delayed) execution of the whip.  Thus, it is necessary to have a more comprehensive study on the implementation of the ‘Uqubat whip especially the rules that govern more about ‘Uqubat whip for women who are pregnant in Qanun number 6 year 2014 about Jinayat.]
Justice and Utility in the Settlement of “Klacht Delict” through Mediation: Concept and Impact in Aceh Husin, Muhammad; Syahrin, Alvi; Din, Mohd.; Ilyas, Ilyas
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 8, No 1 (2024): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v8i1.22530

Abstract

This article examines the process of settlement of criminal cases of whole complaints resolved in Aceh through mediation. The settlement of “klacht delict (delik aduan)” cases in Aceh is practiced in the customary law society by directing the Qanun Aceh. The main focus of this study is the process of its completion, the legal effectiveness of the concept of mediation, as well as consideration of aspects of the legal purpose of the mediation process. This study uses empirical juridical methods which are analyzed using a restorative justice approach and legal sociology. Data was collected by conducting in-depth interviews and document studies. The results of the research showed that the criminal complaints settled by mediation with the non-litigation pattern practiced by law enforcement and the community in Aceh have met the legal objectives, including the aspects of utility and justice. This model of settlement has met the requirements of usefulness and justice for perpetrators and victims and is considered complete, so the case has not proceeded to the stage of investigation and is not passed on to the prosecution. Nevertheless, the settlement through mediation is not satisfied from the point of view of legal certainty, as the general criminal gap must not be resolved by mediation. Sociologically, this legal rule has an impact on society regarding criminal complaints that are resolved through mediation through non-litigation and are never again demanded for a law enforcement process regarding the results of the mediation which has been stated in the peace deed. So mediation has an impact on the realization of peace and order in society.
Justice Delayed, Justice Denied: A Critical Examination of Repeated Suspect Status in Indonesia Susilo, Erwin; Din, Mohd.; Suhaimi, Suhaimi; Mansur, Teuku Muttaqin
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 10 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v10i3.6088

Abstract

The Indonesian criminal justice system faces critical issues with the repeated designation of individuals as suspects, which compromises legal certainty and the protection of human rights. This study provides a critical analysis of the procedural and ethical consequences of repeated suspect designations within the framework of Indonesia's Criminal Procedure Code. This study employs a doctrinal legal research methodology, incorporating statute, case and conceptual approaches. The results show that pretrial judges assess the validity of suspect designations based on procedural and formal principles. Their authority is confined to reviewing formal aspects. These limitations underscore that pretrial proceedings focus solely on administrative and procedural compliance rather than the substantive merits of the case. This formalist perspective follows civil procedural principles, emphasizing procedural correctness over material truth. While pretrial judges can annul a suspect designation, investigators can re-designate the person as a suspect if new evidence is presented. Such a reform would ensure a more balanced relationship between judicial oversight and investigative authority, minimizing arbitrary practices and enhancing procedural fairness. However, the recurring practice of re-designating suspects raises a significant flaw in the system, undermining legal certainty and eroding public trust.