Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.503
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AL-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Law Research Review Quarterly IBLAM Law Review Journal Evidence Of Law At-Tanwir Law Review Jurnal Relasi Publik Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan International Journal of Law and Society Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora International Journal of Sociology and Law
Bunga, Marten
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
The Impact of Money Politics on Democracy Moonti, Roy Marthen; bunga, Marten
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol 4 No 4 (2018): L. Research Rev. Q. (November 2018) "Law and Democracy in General Election: Betwe
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/snh.v4i03.26978

Abstract

Money politic, being recognized or not, is a very frightening scourge for democratic process in Indonesia. Politic and money are two different things but cannot be separated each other. It is because by doing politic, people need money, and with money, people can do the politic. The politic, basically, is a very tantalize arena to do various transactions which is well-known as money politic. The money politic is not a new thing for democratic system in Indonesia. From the very first time direct election is carried out, the money politic practices have been done, thus, we must be aware to those practices. We must not involve in money politic practices, because it is clearly harm the democratic process of this nation. Besides, the money politic not only underestimates the electors and the politicians, but also the democratic institution of this nation. Therefore, it causes some continuously conflicts which basically damages the national stability. The conflicts caused by money politic are unstable politic climate and situation, reducing the opportunity for the qualified district heads, influencing the people’s politic participation in both district head and general elections and harming the democratic as well as people.
PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN DAERAH DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN OTONOMI DAERAH Bunga, Marten
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 20 No 2: November 2017
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (184.846 KB) | DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v20i2.8

Abstract

Regulations in the area of regional autonomy is as a policy instrument in the regional administration of the widest. The formation of local regulations in accordance with the public interest its implementation should be based on the principles of local autonomy and substance of local regulations must not conflict with the public interest and the law is higher. Abstrak Peraturan di bidang otonomi daerah adalah sebagai instrumen kebijakan dalam pemerintahan daerah yang seluas-luasnya. Pembentukan peraturan daerah sesuai dengan kepentingan publik pelaksanaannya harus didasarkan pada prinsip-prinsip otonomi daerah dan substansi peraturan daerah tidak boleh bertentangan dengan kepentingan publik dan hukum lebih tinggi.
MODEL PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN DAERAH YANG IDEAL DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN OTONOMI DAERAH Bunga, Marten
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the model formation of regional regulations in the implementation of regional autonomy. This research method used is included in the type of normative legal research that uses secondary data obtained from library materials in the form of primary legal material. The results of the study indicate that regional regulations in the implementation of regional autonomy are a policy instrument in the implementation of the regional government. Establishment of regional regulations that are in accordance with the interests of the community must implement the principles of regional autonomy and the content of regional regulations must not conflict with higher laws and regulations. The ideal model of regional regulation in the implementation of regional autonomy is the principle of openness and community participation and the harmonization of laws and regulations that regulate it so that the regulations do not overlap.
Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Perempuan Berhadapan dengan Hukum di Pengadilan Negeri Marisa Sasongko, Catyawi Avesta; Akili, Rustam Hs.; Ismail, Nurwita; Moonti, Roy Marthen; Bunga, Marten
Jurnal Relasi Publik Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Agustus : Jurnal Relasi Publik
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jrp-widyakarya.v2i3.3238

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the application of Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Cases of Women Against the Law in Marisa District Court of Pohuwato Regency and to determine the obstacles faced by judges in the implementation of Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Cases of Women Against the Law in the jurisdiction of Marisa District Court of Pohuwato Regency. The implementation of this research uses empris research. In this study, researchers used qualitative methods. The implementation of Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2017 concerning guidelines for adjudicating cases of women facing the law Perma number 3 of 2017 is a significant effort in improving justice for women in the Indonesian justice system. The application of these guidelines in the Marisa District Court demonstrates a commitment to respect and protect women's rights. However, the implementation still faces challenges such as a lack of understanding and awareness of judges about gender issues as well as technical obstacles in the implementation of these guidelines. in the sense that the PERMA is still ineffective in its implementation. Although the Marisa District Court has also been running according to trial procedures.
PENERAPAN PROSEDUR TETAP NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2010 TENTANG PENANGULANGAN ANARKIS Kadir, Yusrianto; Marthen Moonti, Roy; Kasim, Ramdhan; Tumuhulawa, Arifin; Bunga, Marten
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (266.321 KB) | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v1i2.43

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Penerapan Prosedur Tetap Nomor 1 Tahun 2010 Tentang Penanggulangan Anarkis dan mengetahui Faktor yang menghabat Penerapan Prosedur Tetap  Nomor 1 Tahun 2010 Tentang Penanggulangan Anarkis. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalan penelitian normatif empiris. Penelitian hukum normatif empiris adalah penelitian hukum mengenai pemberlakuan ketentuan hukum normatif (kodifikasi, undang-undang) secara in action pada setiap peristiwa hukum tertentu yang terjadi dalam masyarakat. Dari penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa Penerapan prosedur tetap nomor 1 tahun 2010 tentang penanggulangan anarkis di satuan brimob polda gorontalo setelah melalui tahapan penelitian ditemukan bahwa ternyata masih kurang efektif karena masih terdapat beberapa aspek yang menjadi penghambat dalam rangka menunjang tugas dan fungsi dari satuan brimob dan factor  yang menghambat Penerapan Prosedur Tetap Nomor 1 Tahun 2010 Tentang Penanggulangan Anarkis Di Satuan Brimob Polda Gorontalo yaitu factor sumber daya manusia, factor sarana dan prasarana dan factor angggaran.
Pemberhentian Tidak Hormat Aparatus Sipil Negara Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Biahimo, Jaqub; Kadir, Yusrianto; Bunga, Marten
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v2i3.375

Abstract

To Analyze the Regulation of Fish Theft and FAD Settlement According to the Provisions of Indonesian Legislation. To Analyze the Criminological Review of the Enforcement of Theft and Damage to FADs.In this study the author, using Empirical research methods. The data sources used in this research are primary and secondary data. The author uses direct observation and interview data collection techniques. In this research, the author analyzes the data using quantitative methods, namely analyzing the data and providing relevant explanations, the problem is discussed further research and analysis is carried out and makes it a conclusion. The problem in Gentuma Subdistrict is that some fishing boats have more FADs than the regulations stipulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2021 so that when there is a problem of fish theft, it cannot be processed because the procedure for releasing fishermen's FADs has violated the rules. Facts have shown that fisheries crime has become a very threatening act to Indonesia's natural resources because it has a detrimental impact on society and the state. This is a threat to the survival of the community and the state because it can damage the environmental ecosystem and also damage the existence of living things in the sea.
Differences In Interpretation Between The District KPU And BAWASLU Of Gorontalo District Related To Administrative Violations Of The 2020 Regional Elections In Gorontalo District Nuna, Moh. Maskun; Moonti, Roy Marthen; Kadir, Yusrianto; Bunga, Marten; Kasim, Muslim
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): July : International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v1i3.88

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to find out the causes of differences in interpretation between the Gorontalo Regency KPU and Bawaslu Gorontalo Regency regarding administrative violations of the 2020 elections in Gorontalo Regency and how the process of resolving administrative violations of the 2020 elections in Gorontalo Regency by the Gorontalo Regency KPU and Bawaslu Gorontalo Regency. This research uses two legal research methods, namely: Normative and empirical legal research to find answers to the differences in interpretation between the KPU and Bawaslu Gorontalo Regency regarding administrative violations of the 2020 Pilkada in Gorontalo Regency. The difference in interpretation between the Regency KPU and Bawaslu Gorontalo Regency regarding administrative violations is caused by overlapping statutory provisions. Where in Law Number 10 Year 201 concerning Pilkada, the two institutions are given the authority to examine and decide administrative violations, then the two institutions in deciding administrative violations have their own guidelines where Bawaslu is guided by Perbawaslu while the KPU itself is guided by KPU Regulations. This certainly does not provide legal certainty for justice seekers in election administration violations and the process of resolving administrative violations in the 2020 Pilkada in Gorontalo Regency, namely through DKPP and Constitutional Court decisions. We do not have to face different decisions between the two institutions because DKPP is an ethical judicial institution while the Constitutional Court is a legal judicial institution. Although there has been a decision from the Constitutional Court, it does not change the DKPP's decision because until now there has been no ethics court to appeal the DKPP's decision.
TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA Asmongin, Bharata Prabowo; Bunga, Marten; Tumuhulawa, Arifin
At-Tanwir Law Review Vol 5, No 1 (2025): Februari 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universtitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31314/atlarev.v5i1.4066

Abstract

This study examines public information disclosure by local governments from a criminal law perspective, focusing on weaknesses in the formulation of criminal offenses and the effectiveness of law enforcement. Based on the lex specialis derogat lex generalis principle, Law No. 14 of 2008 on Public Information Disclosure (UU PID) as a special regulation has not specifically formulated criminal offenses, particularly regarding the criminal liability of public bodies or corporations. Existing criminal sanctions, such as a maximum prison sentence of one year or fines, are deemed insufficient to provide an optimal deterrent effect. The dispute resolution mechanism through the Information Commission is procedurally effective but faces implementation challenges. The process begins with mediation and proceeds to adjudication if mediation fails. However, low legal understanding among public bodies, weak sanction enforcement, and inadequate oversight of decision implementation remain significant obstacles.This study recommends strengthening regulations through clearer formulation of criminal offenses, establishing criminal liability for public bodies, and enhancing the effectiveness of sanctions. Additionally, it is necessary to improve the capacity of law enforcement officers and public bodies in understanding and implementing the UU PID. Thus, public information disclosure in local governments can be carried out more effectively, accountably, and transparently.
Evaluasi Pengaruh Kebijakan Anti-Korupsi terhadap Efektivitas Penyaluran dan Program Bantuan Pendidikan di Indonesia Huntua, Hariyanto; Moonti, Roy Marthen; Bunga, Marten; Kasim, Muslim A.
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i3.913

Abstract

Corruption in the disbursement of educational aid funds poses a serious challenge that undermines the effectiveness of education policies in Indonesia, particularly within programs such as the Indonesia Smart Program (PIP) and the Family Hope Program (PKH). Irregularities in fund management, weak supervision, and the lack of transparency and accountability have led to unequal distribution of aid and a decline in the quality of educational services. This study aims to evaluate the impact of anti-corruption policies on the effectiveness of educational fund distribution through a normative approach using secondary data. The findings indicate that the implementation of anti-corruption policies, supported by the digitalization of financial systems, public participation, and institutional reform at the local level, has a significant effect in reducing the misuse of educational funds. However, the effectiveness of these policies heavily depends on political commitment, the capacity of supervisory institutions, and public legal awareness. Therefore, synergy between law, technology, a culture of integrity, and community participation is essential to building clean and equitable education governance in pursuit of Indonesia Emas 2045.  
Mechanism For Impeaching The Vice Regent Of Gorontalo Regency For The Period 2016-2020 Asuki, Teddy Permana; Kadir, Yusrianto; Moonti, Roy Marthen; Bunga, Marten; Kasim, Muslim
International Journal of Sociology and Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): May : International Journal of Sociology and Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsl.v1i2.78

Abstract

The research aims at investigating he mechanism for impeaching the Vice Regent period for 2016-2020 Gorontalo district and factors that influence Vice Regent to be impeached. This research is empirical research or direct research. The research is used descriptive analysis method so that the comprehensive view picture can be obtained regarding the rules which related to applicable rules or norms. The impeachment process is starts begins with a report submitted by a society the Regional House of Representatives, which is the legislature's commissions. Then it was continued with the formation of a Special Committee to hold a plenary session of the impeachment process for the 2016-2020 Deputy Regent. From the final results of the process in the realm of the Regional People's Representative Council, it is submitted to the Supreme Court in Deciding and establishing an Opinion from the Regional People's Representative Council which is then validated by the Minister of Home Affairs and returned to the regional government to announce the decision on the dismissal. The legal basis for the process and prohibition of a leader is regulated in the 1945 Constitution in conjunction with Law number 23 of 2014 concerning regional government.
Co-Authors Akili, Rustam Hs. Arifin Tumuhulawa Asmongin, Bharata Prabowo Asuki, Teddy Permana Biahimo, Jaqub Huntua, Hariyanto Ibrahim Ahmad Ismail, Nurwita Kadir, Yusrianto Kasim, Muslim Kasim, Muslim A. Kasim, Ramdhan Koni, Yoslan K. Marthen Moonti, Roy Moonti, Roy Moonti, Roy Marthen Nuna, Moh. Maskun Sasongko, Catyawi Avesta